Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Photo: Adobe Stock
Newsletter
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

Energy Fact & Opinion: European Commission Releases Sustainable Energy Security Strategy

February 19, 2016

Facts:

  • On February 16, the European Commission released its proposed sustainable energy security strategy for the European Energy Union. The strategy takes the form of a number of recommendations and binding regulations for Energy Union member states that will have to be approved by the European Parliament and the European Council (made up of the leaders of European Union member states).
  • One such regulation stipulates that the European Commission can review, approve, and amend intergovernmental natural gas supply agreements between member states and non-member states to ensure that they comply with European Union laws and regulations, and that they do not negatively affect other Member States’ gas supply security. According to the regulation, the Commission will review such agreements before they are signed to avoid the arduous task of renegotiating agreements found to violate European Union law. The Commission would also gain the authority to preemptively review gas supply contracts that give individual suppliers more than 40 percent market share in a single member state.
  • The strategy also focuses on increasing security of energy supply through infrastructure improvements. To this end, it reiterates previous regulations that require that all cross-border gas interconnections be capable of reversing gas flows unless an interconnector’s owner applies for an exemption, and offers non-binding recommendations for improved building efficiency, encouraging renewables, and making use of waste heating and cooling.
  • Finally, the strategy requires that member states task government or regulatory bodies to create regional cooperation mechanisms to assess gas supply risks and formulate supply disruption scenarios; to create contingency plans that include both policy- and market-based responses to interruptions that do not impair the functioning of national or EU-wide energy markets; to ensure that supply interruptions in individual member states do not cause interruptions in other states or in the European Union as a whole; and to designate “protected customers” including households, district heating, essential services, and a limited number of small and medium enterprises that would be prioritized in case of a major disruption.
  • The European Commission argued that its legal authority in establishing the strategy’s binding regulations extends from Article 194 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which “recognizes that a certain level of coordination, transparency and cooperation is necessary as regards EU Member States' policies on security of supply, to ensure that the energy market functions properly and that there is a secure supply of gas within the European Union.”

Opinion:

Release of this strategy paper comes at an interesting time for the European Union with concerns over the migration crisis and the possibility of a British exit from the Union. These proposals seek to expand the Commission’s authority in an area previously under the purview of member states (e.g., intergovernmental agreements and commercial contracts on gas supply).

Coming after COP21 in Paris and European climate targets favoring the use of renewable energy, the paper does confirm that the Commission sees natural gas as part of the transition to clean energy, as well as the increased need for imported gas as European production declines. This should give some comfort to Europe’s traditional gas suppliers, such as Russia, Norway, and Algeria, as well as to potential new suppliers, including liquefied natural gas (LNG) exporters from places like the United States, Australia, and east Africa, and also pipeline gas from the Caspian region and the Middle East. At the same time, the strategy paper reinforces previously stated goals of diversity of supply and emergency preparedness for each region of Europe and increased competition that would result from the free flow of gas across borders. It remains an open question whether the instruments the Commission hopes to use to enforce a common market in gas (or Energy Union), including EU-level regulations and financial assistance to build interconnector pipelines and new LNG receiving terminals, are sufficient for the task.

With support from member states, these proposals could go a long way toward breaking down resistance to forming a common gas market, which come mainly from European countries and their companies that treasure “special” relationships with certain traditional suppliers and existing business practices. Member states could actually use new EU regulations to alter the market behavior of incumbents. In contrast, Nord Stream II (an expansion of an undersea gas pipeline system from Russia to Germany) is a project sponsored by incumbents—Russia’s Gazprom and five companies from four different EU member states—to supply the gas Europe presumably wants to import while avoiding transit risks, primarily from Ukraine. How this project fits into the vision of a competitive gas market with diversified supply, as articulated in this strategy paper, and how the European Commission and Germany will approach Nord Stream II will be interesting to watch for observers on both sides of the Atlantic.
Written By
Edward C. Chow
Senior Associate (Non-resident), Energy Security and Climate Change Program
Zachary Cuyler
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Related
Climate Change, Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks, Energy Security and Climate Change Program, Energy and Geopolitics, Energy and Sustainability, Europe, European Union, NATO

Most Recent From Edward C. Chow

In the News
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to visit Ukraine next week, sources say
CNBC | Kayla Tausche
January 22, 2020
In the News
What Joe Biden Actually Did in Ukraine
New York Times | Glenn Thrush and Kenneth P. Vogel
November 11, 2019
In the News
Naftogaz Chief: Ukraine Can Still Supply Gas to Europe in Early 2020 Without Russia Deal
Voice of America | Tatiana Vorozhko
September 21, 2019
In the News
LNG exports slammed amid US-China trade battle
Alaska Journal | Larry Persily
May 22, 2019
In the News
New York Times, Bloomberg square off over Biden-Ukraine reporting
The Washington Post | Erik Wemple
May 9, 2019
In the News
China, Russia May Vie For Turkmenistan's Gas
Radio Free Asia | Michael Lelyveld
May 6, 2019
In the News
Cheniere, Sinopec in talks for long-term LNG supply contract: source
S & P Global | Daisy Xu and Oceana Zhou
March 7, 2019
On Demand Event
International Energy Outlook 2018
July 24, 2018
View all content by this expert
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2021. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions