Into the Great Wide Open: How Millennials Look at Trade
December 21, 2018
A version of this article was originally published by Stimson Center on November 7, 2016.
Over the holidays, we are rerunning previous columns that remain of interest. This is the second of three that were written while I was at the Stimson Center.
Last week, I wrote about demography and the opportunity worker-deficient nations have to put themselves back on the path to growth by taking in young workers from countries that have a surplus. I had no illusions that anyone would follow my advice, and so far, there is no evidence anyone has. There is, however, another aspect to demographic reality that deserves some comment, and that is how a changing population inside a country changes its politics and policy.
The United States right now is a good laboratory for that. My generation, the baby boomers, the largest in our history, is beginning to fade from the scene. As one of the first boomers, I’m not planning on fading anytime soon, but there is an inevitability in the passage of time that we all must acknowledge. What people are beginning to realize is the impact a generation of this size has on our economy and our politics. Sixty years ago, the problem was building enough schools to hold all of us. Then it was finding enough jobs to keep everyone employed. Now it is finding enough money for retirement and to pay ever-increasing health-care costs. I suspect columnists will soon be writing about the cemetery shortage and the advantages of cremation.
Since we are many and we vote, my generation has been able to influence the public policy debate into addressing things we care about, which right now are health care, taxes, retirement benefits and, for some, the high cost of educating our children and grandchildren. And, like every generation before us, except perhaps the one immediately before us, we have voted for what is good for us without much thought as to whether it’s good for everybody.
It now appears that is changing. The millennials have not only gained on us; they have taken over. According to the Census Bureau in 2016, there are more millennials (75.9 million) than boomers (74.9 million), and Gen Xers, the smaller generation between the other two, will pass us by 2028. Post-millennials—those born between 1998 and 2014—will be even more than the millennials, though not as many as us boomers.
With the change in population inevitably comes change in policy. Our elections will increasingly be about what the millennials want, assuming they actually begin to vote, which is an open question at this point. There has been a lot written about what they are like and what they want, not all of it flattering (though I am very proud of both my Gen X son and my millennial son), but since this column is about trade and international economic policy, let’s focus on that, and there they appear to be a remarkably fearless and outward-looking group. Looking at the Brexit vote in the United Kingdom, for example, people under 35 opposed leaving the European Union by 65 percent to 35 percent. It was my generation, the pensioners, who favored it 60 percent to 40 percent. That’s ironic since much of the debate was about immigrants coming in and stealing jobs; yet the group that had the most to lose if that happened was strongly supportive.
In the United States, we see the same thing, as the following chart, courtesy of Bruce Stokes and the Pew Research Center, shows.
So, policymakers be prepared—trade is not going away and will not be a four-letter word much longer. All I have to do is get my kids to vote.
William Reinsch holds the Scholl Chair in International Business at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, D.C.
Commentary is produced by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a private, tax-exempt institution focusing on international public policy issues. Its research is nonpartisan and nonproprietary. CSIS does not take specific policy positions. Accordingly, all views, positions, and conclusions expressed in this publication should be understood to be solely those of the author(s).
© 2018 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.