Missile Defense Is Compatible with Arms Control

This commentary was originally published in War on the Rocks on April 29, 2021.

What will it take for Russia and the United States to make progress on arms control? In announcing the Biden administration’s intent to extend the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) for another five years, Secretary of State Antony Blinken offered a hint. He noted that the next negotiation must include all of Russian and U.S. nuclear weapons, not just the long-range strategic systems limited by New START. Since New START was ratified in 2010, Russia has been unwilling to discuss limits on its shorter-range systems. When it does address the subject, it immediately lays down a number of pre-conditions, including limitations on U.S. missile defense systems.

Some analysts suggest that the United States should place limits on its missile defense systems to entice Russia—which publicly opposes U.S. missile defense plans—back to the negotiating table. According to one recent commentary, “limiting defenses would therefore be an essential first step to constraining the nuclear arms race.” In War on the Rocks, Naomi Egel and Jane Vaynman recently argued that U.S. officials should “reassess whether the gains from preserving missile defense are worth the tradeoffs.”

Read the full article on War on the Rocks.


Robert Soofer

Robert Soofer

Former Senior Associate (Non-resident), Missile Defense Project