Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

Topics

  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Climate Change and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Innovation and New Energy Sources
    • Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Photo: ROSLAN RAHMAN/AFP/Getty Images
Newsletter
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

The Role of LNG in the United States’ Indo-Pacific Strategy

October 24, 2019

This essay was originally published by the National Bureau of Asian Research on October 17, 2019.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This essay explores the origins, goals, and limits of the Trump administration’s strategic decision to put liquefied natural gas (LNG) at the center of the U.S. Indo-Pacific strategy.

MAIN ARGUMENT

With the United States emerging as a major LNG supplier, and the Indo-Pacific as the main market for LNG, there is an underlying commercial logic bringing the two together. The Trump administration wants to leverage this mutually beneficial relationship to advance its broader strategy in the region. In some ways, this approach builds on general trends that have been progressing in both the region and the industry, but there is also a possibility of additional investment flowing in response to new policy instruments being created to facilitate gas projects. There are risks, however, in a strategy that relies too much on LNG to further policy objectives. First, the trade in LNG is driven by commercial factors, so there is only so much that the U.S. government can do to have an impact on investment and other decisions. Second, LNG is usually too small to affect a broad and complicated bilateral relationship. Third, overly politicizing a commodity could undermine U.S. strategic interests by reducing confidence in the market and leading countries to take measures that lessen their reliance on LNG more broadly or U.S. LNG more specifically.

POLICY IMPLICATIONS

  • LNG is increasingly interwoven into U.S. grand strategy. In some areas LNG can help advance U.S. interests, but it is all too often a limited tool for resolving bilateral or regional disputes.
  • Although the private sector will largely dictate the major decisions on how much LNG the U.S. will produce and where it will go, the U.S. government has a clear interest in supporting exports and, to that end, is fine-tuning a toolkit to facilitate investment in gas and LNG infrastructure. At the margins, this toolkit can play an important role.
  • U.S. policy often blurs the line between advertising U.S. LNG, nudging countries to buy it, and suggesting that U.S. LNG could solve other political problems in a bilateral relationship. Carrots are fine, but sticks will backfire—at least eventually.

Read the full essay in NBR Special Report #81 | October 2019 here.

Written By
Nikos Tsafos
Senior Fellow, Energy and National Security Program
Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Emma Colbran
Communications and Program Manager
Tel: 202.775.3211
Related
Analysis, Asia, Commentaries, Critical Questions, and Newsletters, Energy and National Security Program, Energy and Geopolitics, Energy and Sustainability, Markets, Trends, and Outlooks, Southeast Asia

Most Recent From Nikos Tsafos

Commentary
Is It (Finally) Time for a Gas OPEC?
By Nikos Tsafos
December 6, 2019
In the News
Flood of cheap LNG from Qatar imperils rival North American projects
Reuters | Scott DiSavino and Jessica Resnick-Ault
November 27, 2019
Blog Post
The EIB Decides against Gas—Now What?
By Nikos Tsafos
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
November 21, 2019
On Demand Event
Energy Transition Outlook 2019
November 20, 2019
Blog Post
Does LNG Have a China Problem?
By Nikos Tsafos
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
November 14, 2019
In the News
With Coal In Decline, The U.S. Could Also Get Cut Out Of The Global Natural Gas Market. China And India May Be Key
Forbes | Ken Silverstein
November 5, 2019
Commentary
The United States in the East Med: A Case Study in Energy Diplomacy
By Nikos Tsafos
November 4, 2019
In the News
Daily on Energy: Time running out to stop Nord Stream 2
Washington Examiner | Josh Siegel and Abby Smith
October 31, 2019
View all content by this expert
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Emma Colbran
Communications and Program Manager
Tel: 202.775.3211

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to More CSIS Newsletters

Newsletter Subscription
Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2019. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions