Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Critical Questions
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

Shah Deniz II Final Investment Decision Announced in Baku

December 17, 2013

President Ilham Aliyev of Azerbaijan and a number of Western leaders witnessed December 17 in Baku the signing of documents for the final investment decision (FID) on the Shah Deniz phase II development. Shah Deniz gas exports from Azerbaijan will bring new volumes of natural gas to Europe. The consortium aims for the first gas deliveries from the project to reach Turkey in 2018 and Europe in 2019.

Q1: The Shah Deniz gas and condensate field was discovered in 1999, why did it take so long to get to this stage?  Numerous declarations and agreements were signed in the past, what makes this announcement different?

A1: Mega petroleum projects such as Shah Deniz, which contains 1.2 trillion cubic meters of natural gas (40 trillion cubic feet), take significant time to develop and to finalize the necessary commercial agreements before large investments can begin. This is particularly true for major gas developments that involve multiple countries. The agreements signed today allow the partners in Shah Deniz, which include the State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR), BP, Statoil, Total, the Turkish national oil and gas company TPAO, LUKoil and NICO, to proceed with investments of around $28 billion for the second stage of Shah Deniz gas field development and the expansion of the South Caucasus Gas Pipeline to Turkey. It triggers plans for building the Trans Anatolian Gas Pipeline (TANAP) across Turkey and the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) across Greece, Albania and into Italy, bringing the total value chain to around $40 billion. In order to allow such large investments to go forward, Azerbaijan extended the term of the production sharing agreement for Shah Deniz to 2048.

Q2: Is this important?  Why?

A2: Shah Deniz II will supply 16 billion cubic meters (bcm) of natural gas annually (additional 6 bcm to Turkey and 10 bcm to consumers in Europe). It will also increase condensate production from 55 thousand barrels per day currently to 120 thousand. The project and associated pipelines will link the gas markets of southeastern Europe and provide an additional source of gas to markets that previously relied primarily on a single source, leading to supply vulnerability and high import prices. Development of this so-called Southern Corridor for European gas imports comes at a critical time for Europe as it struggles to balance its climate change policy objectives with renewable energy subsidies, economic competiveness, and the role for natural gas while coal consumption and associated greenhouse gas emissions in Europe increase (at a recent presentation at CSIS, Dr. Fatih Birol, IEA Chief Economist, noted that in 2014, the EU will need to set a new energy policy.) Shah Deniz/TANAP/TAP will bring Caspian gas for the first time into a major European gas market and can demonstrate the economic viability of the Southern Corridor, which could lead to additional pipeline gas supply to Europe from the Middle East, Central Asia, and Eastern Mediterranean. 

Q3: What is U.S. interest?

A3: For all of the post-Soviet period, American policy has encouraged countries in the Caspian to diversify energy export routes in order to secure new markets for their oil and gas, achieve greater economic autonomy and strengthen their newly found political independence. Diversity of supply routes benefits both energy exporting and importing countries. In recent years, America’s attention, including in this region, has been preoccupied elsewhere. Today’s announcement is a reminder that important objectives can still be accomplished by a policy that started twenty years ago and America’s support can play a useful role. The countries in the region certainly believe this. There are lessons to be learned by American policymakers from the long journey of Shah Deniz development on the importance of steadfastness in policy attention and sustained well-coordinated effort needed to achieve significant objectives in energy diplomacy, while working in concert with commercial realities.

Edward C. Chow is a senior fellow with the Energy and National Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington D.C. Professor Brenda Shaffer is a visiting professor at Georgetown University’s Center for Eurasian, Russian and East European Studies (CERES) from Haifa University in Israel.

 

Critical Questions is produced by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a private, tax-exempt institution focusing on international public policy issues. Its research is nonpartisan and nonproprietary. CSIS does not take specific policy positions. Accordingly, all views, positions, and conclusions expressed in this publication should be understood to be solely those of the author(s).

Written By
Edward C. Chow
Senior Associate (Non-resident), Energy Security and Climate Change Program
Prof. Brenda Shaffer
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Related
Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks, Energy Security and Climate Change Program, Energy and Geopolitics, Energy and Sustainability, Russia and Eurasia

Most Recent From Edward C. Chow

In the News
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to visit Ukraine next week, sources say
CNBC | Kayla Tausche
January 22, 2020
In the News
What Joe Biden Actually Did in Ukraine
New York Times | Glenn Thrush and Kenneth P. Vogel
November 11, 2019
In the News
Naftogaz Chief: Ukraine Can Still Supply Gas to Europe in Early 2020 Without Russia Deal
Voice of America | Tatiana Vorozhko
September 21, 2019
In the News
LNG exports slammed amid US-China trade battle
Alaska Journal | Larry Persily
May 22, 2019
In the News
New York Times, Bloomberg square off over Biden-Ukraine reporting
The Washington Post | Erik Wemple
May 9, 2019
In the News
China, Russia May Vie For Turkmenistan's Gas
Radio Free Asia | Michael Lelyveld
May 6, 2019
In the News
Cheniere, Sinopec in talks for long-term LNG supply contract: source
S & P Global | Daisy Xu and Oceana Zhou
March 7, 2019
On Demand Event
International Energy Outlook 2018
July 24, 2018
View all content by this expert
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2021. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions