Strength Abroad Begins with Healing and Unity at Home

The Perspective of CSIS Scholars
Over the course of decades of work on national security for both Republican and Democratic administrations, we have seen a broad convergence among experts on both sides of the aisle around many of the core elements necessary for a successful national security strategy for the United States. Yet over the same period, we have also seen differences grow over the social compact that holds us together as a nation. This is far from the first time our country has experienced division or that internal divisions have hurt our interests abroad. The Constitution talks about a MORE perfect union, acknowledging both our imperfections and our necessary efforts to overcome them. That is the patriotic ethos of refinement and improvement that drives our work at CSIS and serves as our mandate from the Center’s leadership and Board.
We are witnessing a new and particularly disturbing manifestation of divisions in our society compounded by the coronavirus pandemic, economic downturn, and the actions of those who would either deny the right of peaceful protests or hijack those protests for destructive purposes. In our own work on strengthening American alliances, energy and climate security, economic expansion, defense capabilities, development, global health, and support for democracy, we recognize that success abroad depends more than ever on strategies for healing and unity at home.
The divisions in our society have longstanding historical roots, but they are not part of an inevitable trajectory. Wise leadership at all levels and across the political spectrum could now bend the arc of history and restore the example of American democracy that has inspired hundreds of millions of citizens living in free societies around the world and given hope to many millions more living under repressive regimes. The constant in our history has not been our perfection, but rather a willingness to redress our shortcomings as a path toward a brighter and more secure future. Self-criticism is as essential a part of the American creed as optimism.
Healing and unity at home is a matter of national security. As with all national security strategies, unity and healing require deliberate and persistent lines of effort:
- Leaders at all levels and in all organizations and communities—including ourselves—must redouble efforts to address systemic legacies of racism, social injustice, broken discourse, and failing empathy. Institutions like ours can make an important contribution as we always have by continuing to develop bipartisan solutions based on research and data that contribute to a shared assessment of our challenges and by seeking perspectives that reflect the diversity of our country.
- Leaders at all levels—in the private sector, civil society, and government—must recognize that economic inequality threatens our national security in terms of social cohesion and inclusion and also in terms of the sustainability of growth itself. Free markets drive our prosperity and our national strength, and our moral and material interests dictate that we examine how best to foster inclusive growth to ensure opportunity for all.
- Leaders at all levels must repair the damage to civil-military relations we have seen in recent years as the military has been drawn increasingly into American politics. The United States military and our nation’s strong civil-military ethos have been models for countries around the world seeking to build just, stable democracies. Remaining faithful to our own constitutional principles and assuring military excellence requires the military to stay out of partisan politics, including ensuring uniformed service members are not seen to stray outside of their operational expertise to endorse the political opinions of leaders or candidates for public office. We must also keep rare and circumscribed the instances in which we contemplate deploying federal military units on American soil in support of state national guard and domestic law enforcement. We must recognize that the standard we set for law enforcement in our country is an important factor in how others measure the validity of the democratic values we espouse.
- Leaders at all levels must remember that how we protect freedom of the press and of religion in these difficult times will be a measure of our commitment to the Constitution and to a more just and stable world beyond our shores. Journalists should be able to hold a light—no matter how embarrassing—on the complex and painful developments in our streets. In our own work, we are committed to providing the facts and the context that can help make that possible. Many of us have spent considerable parts of our careers working to protect religious freedom in other parts of the world and know that our example is powerful abroad because at home we champion no single faith while protecting the rights of all to worship whether and how they desire.
- Leaders at all levels and on all sides of the political divide must set an example for empathetic discourse, for listening to other perspectives, and for seeking collective solutions through respectful debate. Our enemies are mocking democracy right now. They are claiming that division of powers and accountability to the governed will lead to mob rule and chaos. That ideological assault represents a fundamental threat to the post-war order the United States and its allies built. We prove the authoritarian critics are wrong when we listen, seek solutions, and, if necessary, disagree respectfully and without consequences for the dissenter.
In our work on national security, we pride ourselves on nonpartisanship, rigorous inquiry, and inclusive solutions to problems. In this moment of national crisis, we recommit ourselves to working toward healing and unity as we engage with our professional colleagues, our friends and allies abroad, and especially our staff here at CSIS—who we expect will carry this mantle forward in the decades ahead. We do not claim this in isolation. We know that many of our friends and colleagues at peer institutions share the same commitments in their work. We will endeavor to convince our national leaders to follow these same principles while adhering to the nonpartisan, fact-driven strategic solutions to policy challenges that drew us to this work in the first place.
Jon B. Alterman Senior Vice President, Zbigniew Brzezinski Chair in Global Security and Geostrategy, and Director, Middle East Program Jude Blanchette Freeman Chair in China Studies Katherine Bliss Senior Fellow, Global Health Policy Center Samuel Brannen Senior Fellow, International Security Program and Director, Risk and Foresight Group Ben Cahill Senior Fellow, Energy Security and Climate Change Program Mark F. Cancian Senior Adviser, International Security Program Victor Cha Senior Adviser and Korea Chair Heather A. Conley Senior Vice President for Europe, Eurasia, and the Arctic; and Director, Europe Program Anthony H. Cordesman Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy Melissa Dalton Senior Fellow and Deputy Director, International Security Program, and Director, Cooperative Defense Project Judd Devermont Director, Africa Program Morgan Dwyer Fellow, International Security Program and Deputy Director for Policy Analysis, Defense-Industrial Initiatives Group Rachel Ellehuus Deputy Director, Europe Program Alice Hunt Friend Senior Fellow, International Security Program Matthew P. Funaiole Senior Fellow, China Power Project and Senior Fellow for Data Analysis, iDeas Lab Bonnie S. Glaser Senior Adviser for Asia; Director, China Power Project Matthew P. Goodman Senior Vice President for Economics and Simon Chair in Political Economy Michael J. Green Senior Vice President for Asia and Japan Chair
|
Scott Kennedy Senior Adviser and Trustee Chair in Chinese Business and Economics Beverly Kirk Fellow and Director for Outreach, International Security Program, and Director, Smart Women, Smart Power Initiative Jacob Kurtzer Interim Director and Senior Fellow, Humanitarian Agenda Sarah Ladislaw Senior Vice President; Director and Senior Fellow, Energy Security and Climate Change Program Louis Lauter Vice President for Congressional and Government Affairs Amy K. Lehr Director, Human Rights Initiative James Andrew Lewis Senior Vice President and Director, Technology Policy Program Rhys McCormick Fellow, Defense-Industrial Initiatives Group Scott Miller Senior Adviser, Abshire-Inamori Leadership Academy J. Stephen Morrison Senior Vice President and Director, Global Health Policy Center Jane Nakano Senior Fellow, Energy Security and Climate Change Program Gregory B. Poling Senior Fellow for Southeast Asia and Director, Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative William Alan Reinsch Senior Adviser and Scholl Chair in International Business Moises Rendon Director, The Future of Venezuela Initiative and Fellow, Americas Program Richard M. Rossow Senior Adviser and Wadhwani Chair in U.S.-India Policy Studies Daniel F. Runde Senior Vice President; William A. Schreyer Chair and Director, Project on Prosperity and Development Gregory Sanders Deputy Director and Fellow, Defense-Industrial Initiatives Group Whitley Saumweber Director, Stephenson Ocean Security Project John Schaus Fellow, International Security Program Stephanie Segal Senior Fellow, Economics Program Margarita R. Seminario Deputy Director and Senior Fellow, Americas Program Lindsey R. Sheppard Fellow, International Security Program Suzanne Spaulding Senior Adviser, Homeland Security, International Security Program Nicholas Szechenyi Deputy Director and Senior Fellow, Japan Chair; Asia Program Nikos Tsafos Senior Fellow, Energy Security and Climate Change Program Caitlin Welsh Director, Global Food Security Program Ian Williams Fellow, International Security Program and Deputy Director, Missile Defense Project Erol Yayboke Deputy Director and Senior Fellow, Project on Prosperity and Development, Project on U.S. Leadership in Development |
Commentary is produced by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a private, tax-exempt institution focusing on international public policy issues. Its research is nonpartisan and nonproprietary. CSIS does not take specific policy positions. Accordingly, all views, positions, and conclusions expressed in this publication should be understood to be solely those of the author(s).
© 2020 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.