Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

Topics

  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Climate Change and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Innovation and New Energy Sources
    • Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Report
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

Turkey's Military Options for Dealing with the PKK

A Preliminary Assessment

October 31, 2007

The Kurdish Workers Party (PKK), a group the United States, the European Union, and Turkey consider a terrorist organization, has been staging attacks in Turkey from camps in the mountainous border regions in northern Iraq for three decades. The Turkish public has become outraged by escalating PKK attacks in recent weeks, and on October 17, the Turkish parliament by a nearly unanimous vote authorized cross-border military strikes into Iraq against the PKK. This has raised fears of wider regional instability and further tension in Ankara’s relations with Washington.

In the current crisis, Turkey’s military options are likely to have limited effect on the PKK and are fraught with international and domestic political risks. For this reason, Ankara is pursuing diplomacy. The Turks must know, though, that it is nearly impossible for the central Iraqi government in Baghdad to take real action against the PKK, and it is highly unlikely that the Kurdish regional government will take action under current circumstances. The United States is rightly worried about maintaining relative stability in northern Iraq and is unlikely to commit forces to hunt for the PKK because of the existing demands of operations elsewhere in the country. Covert cooperation with Turkey is a possibility, but such action would have significant operational challenges due to the harsh geography and would not repair relations with a restive Turkish public that has lost confidence in their U.S. ally. Also, U.S. special operations forces are already under tremendous demand elsewhere in Iraq and in Afghanistan. U.S. involvement may also risk opening a new front against U.S. troops in Iraq at a time when commanders and Pentagon officials are looking to draw down forces. The situation for all parties is dangerous and challenging. Any solution to this crisis would need to come in the larger framework of the future of the Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) as a neighbor to Turkey.

Read More (pdf)

Downloads
Turkey's Military Options for Dealing with the PKK: A Preliminary Assessment
Stephen Flanagan and Sam Brannen
Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Emma Colbran
Communications and Program Manager
Tel: 202.775.3211
Related
Counterterrorism and Homeland Security, Defense and Security, Geopolitics and International Security, International Security Program, Kissinger Chair, Turkey
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Emma Colbran
Communications and Program Manager
Tel: 202.775.3211

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to More CSIS Newsletters

Newsletter Subscription
Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2019. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions