Are Gas Pipelines Really Impossible to Build?
July 8, 2020
By: Nikos TsafosTwo contradictory trends appear to be happening at the same time: on the one hand, there is growing opposition to building new natural gas pipelines, and it seems they are becoming impossible to construct; on the other, U.S. natural gas production and consumption keeps growing, and this gas is being transported on the nation’s pipeline system. What explains this disconnect?
One innocuous explanation is geography: both things are true, but they are not true at the same place. The country is indeed producing and consuming more gas, but gas is not flowing in some areas because there are no or insufficient pipelines to bring it there. There is evidence for that possibility: lack of infrastructure is one reason gas is being flared in the Permian, and the Northeast is well known for its inadequate infrastructure, which is why Massachusetts still imports liquefied natural gas (LNG).
But there is another explanation: a few high-profile cases shape our view in a way that is not representative of the whole. There is no evidence, for instance, that pipeline additions have slowed down in recent years, although there are more pipelines that have reversed flow in recent years—which could be a response to permitting challenges or also the fact that the geography of production has also changed.
This is not to suggest that the permitting system is not broken—or that these pipeline battles are a good way to resolve the competing forces pushing and pulling the energy system. But it is important to review the evidence and see that, despite some high-profile cases that suggest otherwise, there is plenty of pipeline capacity being built in the United States, and it is taking gas along the path of least resistance. In doing so, these pipelines continue to enable an unprecedented expansion in gas production, consumption, and exports.