Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intellectual Property
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Building Sustainable and Inclusive Democracy
    • Business and Human Rights
    • Responding to Egregious Human Rights Abuses
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Human Mobility
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Blog Post - Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

LNG Needs Depth, Not Just Breadth

Energy Headlines vs. Trendlines

January 27, 2020

By: Nikos Tsafos

Over the past decade, the market for liquefied natural gas (LNG) has expanded dramatically: over 20 countries started to import LNG after 2008, opening far and wide a market hitherto limited to a small number of big importers. This expansion has been supercharged by floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs), which simplified the process for a country to become an importer—a story well told in the news, research reports, and company presentations.
 
But there is another side to this story. Many countries join the LNG market, but most stop at a relatively small import volume, and some reduce their imports over time. Only a few markets keep growing, and fewer still become large markets. Consider the graph below, which shows LNG imports into countries that joined the market after 2008 (through 2015 since more recent importers do not have enough data points to establish a trend).
 

There are certainly a few markets that register sharp growth: Pakistan and Thailand stand out and, less so, Singapore, Poland, and the Netherlands (which is a bit of an outlier having seen just a one-year jump in 2018). But it is just as common to find markets that reach a certain level and mostly stay there—Kuwait, Chile, Jordan, Malaysia, and Israel look like they fall in this category (one can always read the data differently). And there is another batch of countries where imports in 2018 were far below their peak: Argentina, Egypt, Brazil, UAE, Lithuania, and Canada.
 
Each country has a story, of course; in some countries, domestic production or pipeline imports replaced LNG (e.g., Argentina, Canada, and Egypt). In others, LNG is a backup that adjusts up and down based on needs (e.g., Brazil and Israel). Others import about as much as they need and may never become large markets (e.g., Lithuania). Others import mostly seasonally, and their plateau might signify infrastructure constraints (e.g., Kuwait).
 
The point here is that the LNG market has been remarkably successful in reaching new markets, but it has a harder time converting these markets into big consumers. Just as often, countries hit a plateau and stay there, or they might even turn to alternatives that reduce their LNG needs. Counting how many markets import LNG is not enough. It is just as vital to chronicle what happens to these markets over time.
 
 
Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Paige Montfort
Media Relations Coordinator, External Relations
Tel: 202.775.3173
Related
Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks, Energy Security and Climate Change Program, Energy and Sustainability

More from this blog

Blog Post
Are Gas Pipelines Really Impossible to Build?
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
July 8, 2020
Blog Post
United States No Longer Reducing Energy-Related Carbon Emissions
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
April 3, 2020
Blog Post
Which U.S. States Are Most Exposed to Low Oil Prices?
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
March 12, 2020
Blog Post
Who is Prepared for an Oil Price War?
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
March 9, 2020
Blog Post
The UAE Nuclear Project Is Nearing Operation, but Will It Usher in a Nuclear Power Boom in the Middle East?
By Jane Nakano
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
February 25, 2020
Blog Post
Emission Peak Could Be as Fickle as the Weather
By Sarah Ladislaw
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
February 14, 2020
Blog Post
The Complex Relationship Between Coal and Gas in Europe
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
February 13, 2020
Blog Post
Energy and the U.S.-China Phase One Trade Deal—Don’t Believe the Hype... At Least Not All of It
By Sarah Ladislaw
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
January 17, 2020

Related Content

Commentary
Gas Line, Q4 2020
January 4, 2021
Commentary
Credibility Gap for Carbon-Neutral LNG
By Ben Cahill
January 19, 2022
Report
Methane Emissions and the Gas Ecosystem: Buyers, Sellers, and Banks
By Ben Cahill, Ian Barlow
December 17, 2021
Commentary
A New Chapter in U.S.-China LNG Relations
December 6, 2021
Report
How Market Factors Could Shape Demand for Cleaner Gas
November 19, 2021
Commentary
Gas Line, Q4 2021
January 10, 2022
Commentary
Qatar’s Looming Decisions in LNG Expansion
By Ben Cahill
September 28, 2020
Commentary
Lessons from the Rally in European Energy Prices
September 24, 2021
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Paige Montfort
Media Relations Coordinator, External Relations
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2022. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions