Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intellectual Property
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Building Sustainable and Inclusive Democracy
    • Business and Human Rights
    • Responding to Egregious Human Rights Abuses
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Human Mobility
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Blog Post - Smart Global Health
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

Post Disaster Mental Health in Japan: Lessons and challenges

March 11, 2015

by: Yukiko Tanisho, Anne Smith, and Hiromi Murakami*

Today marks four years since the Great East Japan Earthquake of March 11, 2011.  The "triple disasters"  -- earthquake, tsunami, and the nuclear reactors’ meltdown -- generated significant psychological stress for the affected population: physical relocations, loss of family members, and loss of income. And March 11 severely tested the efficacy of disaster response policies associated with mental health that Japan had put into place after the earthquake in Kobe in 1995.  In this commentary we present three observations about the shortcomings of Japan's disaster response policies specifically with reference to post-disaster mental health services, and offers concrete recommendations for strengthening future responses.

First, it has become very clear in the past four years just how different 3/11 is from Kobe.  3/11 affected a sizeable northeastern coastal region with massively complex  “triple” disasters that impacted coastal areas as well as rural communities. The tsunami was the foremost cause of 16,000 deaths, (2,600 people are still missing) but resulted in a very low injury rate. The earthquake struck Tohoku region on Friday afternoon when family members were dispersed, in schools or at work, which was far more disruptive emotionally than the Kobe earthquake, which struck in the early morning.  (The far more typical disaster is the 1995 Kobe earthquake, a single, urban-centered event, with relatively low loss of life but a high injury rate.) Rapid-response Disaster Medical Assistance Teams (DMAT) did not exist at the time of Kobe. They did deploy swiftly after 3/11, but were also withdrawn rapidly, since physical injuries were so limited. One week after 3/11, newly-created mental health teams swiftly deployed psychiatrists to carry out focused short-term activities. However, these interventions had limited long-term impact. Rather what was truly needed were ample numbers of social workers and community outreach experts to assist victims in coping with socio-economic stress, trauma and survivor guilt, all of which require sustained, long-term care.

Secondly, it has become apparent in the past four years that much more effort is needed to address the enduring stigma in Japan surrounding mental health services. Indeed stigma remains arguably the highest barrier to accessing mental health services in Japan. The stoic citizens of the Tohoku region have suicide rates well above the national average, reflecting a strong reluctance to access mental health services, as well as minimal available assistance. In the aftermath of 3/11, there was a critical need for mid-to-long term monitoring and focused care for those populations at risk of PTSD, through increased outreach support by trained personnel that reached beyond psychiatric specialists. Especially challenging has been meeting the potential mental health needs of the 230,000 people who to this day remain dislocated from their homes, including 120,000 from Fukushima prefecture, the area most severely impacted by nuclear radiation, and where domestic abuse, alcohol, and suicide are especially acute. Yet that was limited, since Japan places inadequate emphasis on therapists, social workers, and public health nurses, and there is no established official policy for managing highly stigmatized, traumatized populations. To this day, debate over how best to confront stigma persists among psychiatric specialists.

Thirdly, the current process of capturing and analyzing data about the post 3/11 disaster mental health response is haphazard and risks losing important lessons learned that can be relevant for the future in Japan and elsewhere. Disaster-related mental health measures lack clear goals, making evaluating outcomes difficult. The Japanese mental health community is reluctant to put into force clear evaluation measures, for fear they will increase stress on an already traumatized population and raise ethical issues in the collection of personal data. The current arrangement under which the national government covers most of the costs associated with responding to severe disasters weakens the incentives for any party to assess how effectively mental health activities have been.  One result: the central government’s 3-year funding for post-disaster mental health will soon come to a close, without any clear idea of how to tackle these long-term mental health challenges without knowing clearly the lessons learned with respect to mental health services.  

Japan’s experience could be used to create better disaster response mechanisms and processes as well as help shape international disaster-response. It is a time for Japan to engage in a stronger commitment to tackle issues from 3/11.

-          Inefficiencies and misallocation of resources have plagued Japan's response to victims' mental health needs in the aftermath of the 3/11 disasters.  Japan has yet to address issue of sectionalism, or problems associated with specialists deciding each disaster policy. To facilitate effective resource allocation and inter-agency coordination, the government must clearly designate a single authority to assume responsibility for disaster management.

-          Japan must redouble its efforts to address stigma associated with mental health care seeking behavior. Maintaining disaster victims' community ties and social networks is essential, as the Kobe earthquake demonstrated that victims' dislocation from their communities further exacerbated their mental problems. Japan should widely adopt training guidelines, such as WHO’s Psychological First Aid (PFA) which do not require mental health providers in emergency situations to have any specialized psychological or psychiatric expertise to allow volunteers to quickly enter the disaster areas and connect survivors with available resources

-          Finally, it is essential to build plans for monitoring and evaluating disaster response mental health services into the initial costing, budgeting, and appropriation processes.  To this end, Japan should adopt an internationally-standardized method including measurement tools and a system for sharing anonymized data between governments, institutions and other essential stakeholders. By setting measurable clear-cut goals and appropriate evaluation tools, Japan can introduce more effective systems and increase its capacity to deal with the next disaster.

 *This commentary is based on a study conducted by Yukiko Tanisho, Anne Smith, senior associates at the Health and Global Policy Institute, and Hiromi Murakami, adjunct fellow at the Center for Strategic International Studies.

Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Paige Montfort
Media Relations Coordinator, External Relations
Tel: 202.775.3173

More from this blog

Blog Post
U.S.-Japan Dialogue: Strengthening the Partnership on Global Health
By J. Stephen Morrison
In Smart Global Health
July 25, 2017
Blog Post
Yellow Fever in Brazil: The Latest Global Health Security Threat
In Smart Global Health
June 23, 2017
Blog Post
Brazil's Sistema Único da Saúde (SUS): Caught in the Cross Fire
By Katherine E. Bliss
In Smart Global Health
June 21, 2017
Blog Post
GPEI’s Funding Decline Among Tedros’ Top Challenges as WHO Director-General
By Nellie Bristol
In Smart Global Health
June 9, 2017
Blog Post
Achieving TB Milestones Through Last Mile Delivery in India
In Smart Global Health
May 25, 2017
Blog Post
Training the Informal Health Workforce in India
In Smart Global Health
May 22, 2017
Blog Post
What’s to Be Done to End the Opioid Epidemic?
In Smart Global Health
May 19, 2017
Blog Post
New Partnerships Needed after Ebola's Hard Lessons
By J. Stephen Morrison
In Smart Global Health
April 25, 2017

Related Content

Commentary
Reflections on the 10th Anniversary of the Great East Japan Earthquake
By Michael J. Green, Nicholas Szechenyi
March 9, 2021
Report
Disaster Risk Reduction through Digital Transformation in the Western Hemisphere
By Daniel F. Runde
September 27, 2021
Commentary
A Strategic Framework to Improve Coronavirus Response in Africa
August 6, 2020
Commentary
Rebuilding Ukraine after the War
By Cynthia Cook
March 22, 2022
Report
How Japan Can Forge Resiliency and Defense Capacity Building in the Indo-Pacific in the Era of Covid-19
July 17, 2020
Commentary
Haitian Migration: Food Insecurity, Fragility, and a Better Way Forward
By Jamie Lutz, Erol Yayboke
November 22, 2021
Commentary
Bring DOD Fully into the Mix of Pandemic Preparedness and Response
By Thomas Cullison, J. Stephen Morrison
June 30, 2022
Commentary
Good Governance and Corruption in the Caribbean: The Haitian Challenge
By Georges A. Fauriol
October 6, 2020
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Paige Montfort
Media Relations Coordinator, External Relations
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2022. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions