Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

   Ranked #1 Think Tank in U.S. by Global Go To Think Tank Index

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Photo by ResoluteSupportMedia licensed under CC by 2.0
Report
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

The Civil Transition in Afghanistan: The Metrics of Crisis?

December 16, 2014

It is natural to focus on the security problems of Transition in Afghanistan, and the challenges of forming an effective government with Ashraf Ghani and Abdullah Abdullah. As the combined reporting of the World Bank, IMF, and SIGAR indicate, however, Afghanistan may face equally serious challenges in coping with cuts in military spending, aid, capital flight, and the inability of its government to be effective in raising revenues and controlling expenditures.

The Burke Chair at CSIS is issuing a new report entitled The Civil Transition in Afghanistan: The Metrics of Crisis? That report is available on the CSIS web site at https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/141217_Afghan_Civil_Transition.pdf. This report focuses on the near term problems that Afghanistan faces in terms of governance, corruption, funding its budget, economic growth and development, and coping with a return to something approaching a narco-economy.

The report presents a wide range of metrics to help illustrate and bond Afghanistan’s problems. Unlike many reports on aid, it does not make assumptions about the longer term or focus on what might happen in five to 10 years if Afghanistan took decisive action to change the way in which its government functions or could ignore its internal divisions and an ongoing war.

This focus does not necessarily mean that Afghanistan cannot cope with a transition away from massive outside military spending, and rising levels of violence in the near term. The range of metrics presented in this report, however, do warn that outside civil aid is likely to play a critical role in Afghan stability through at least 2018, and that the main need for aid may be to fund government operations – including security, limit increases in poverty, and maintain stability rather than development.

Afghanistan does not need ambitious plans to create an economy in a future where its internal stresses and an ongoing war have somehow mysteriously ended. It needs a hard, pragmatic focus on the present by both its government and outside aid donors, as well as international organizations.
The report also warns that civil society and governance in Afghanistan have very fragile structures, and outside support for aid is limited. It is unlikely that simply having outside powers pledge more aid can be a substitute for well-planned efforts to help Afghanistan achieve some degree of economic stability over the next few years. It is also clear from the trends since 2012 that a failure to bring security can do far more in the future to cripple the Afghan economy, just as failures in governance and the economy can critically undermine security.

At the same time, the Burke Chair is issuing an update to one of its key reports on security transition. This report is entitled Afghan Forces on the Edge of Transition – II: Sharply Contradictory Data on Levels of Violence, which is available on the CSIS web site at https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/141216Security_Transition_in_Afghanistan_II_2.pdf.

This report raises further questions about the credibility – and lack of -- the data on the fighting being issued by NATO, ISAF, and the Department of Defense. It indicates that the surge of US forces after 2010 largely failed, that far more integrity and transparency is needed in reporting on the course of the fighting, and that the limited metrics ISAF and the Department of Defense have issued on the levels of violence are misleading and fundamentally understate the rising scope and levels of violence in the fighting.

The other three reports covering the other aspects of the war, the problems in various elements of the ANSF, and … all reinforce these warnings: These reports include:

Afghan Forces on the Edge of Transition– I: Introduction, US Policy, and Cuts in US Forces and Spending, available on the CSIS web site at https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publicatio /141118_I_Security_Transition_in_Afghanistan_17_NOV_2014_0.pdf

Afghan Forces on the Edge of Transition– III: Measuring the Transition from ISAF to ANSF, available on the CSIS web site at http://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/141118_III_Security_Transition_in_Afghanistan_17_NOV_2014_0.pdf

Afghan Forces on the Edge of Transition– IV: Progress in Afghan Force Development, available on the CSIS web site at http://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/141118_IV_Security_Transition_in_Afghanistan_17_NOV_2014_0.pdf
 

Downloads
Download PDF file of "The Metrics of Crisis"
Download PDF file of "II. Security Transition in Afghanistan 16 DEC 2014"
Written By
Anthony H. Cordesman
Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Related
Afghanistan, Asia, Burke Chair in Strategy, Defense Strategy and Capabilities, Defense and Security, Geopolitics and International Security, Lessons of War, Terrorism and Counterinsurgency

Most Recent From Anthony H. Cordesman

Commentary
The Biden Transition and Reshaping U.S. Strategy: Long Engagements vs. Long Wars
By Anthony H. Cordesman
December 9, 2020
Report
Chronology of Possible Russian Gray Area and Hybrid Warfare Operations
By Anthony H. Cordesman
December 8, 2020
Commentary
The Biden Transition and the Real Impact of U.S. Force Cuts in Afghanistan
By Anthony H. Cordesman
December 1, 2020
Commentary
Iran: Looking Beyond the Assassination
By Anthony H. Cordesman
November 30, 2020
Commentary
Failed Reporting and Analysis of the Afghan Peace Process
By Anthony H. Cordesman
November 18, 2020
In the News
Pentagon Shakeup Creates ‘Layers of Fear,’ Lawmaker Says
Bloomberg | Anthony Capaccio
November 14, 2020
In the News
Chaotic Presidential Transition Brings Vulnerability, Security Risks to Nation
Washington Post | Paul Sonne
November 11, 2020
In the News
An End to the $1 Trillion War in Afghanistan May Be on Horizon
Bloomberg | Roxana Tiron and Travis J. Tritten
November 10, 2020
View all content by this expert
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2020. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions