Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

   Ranked #1 Think Tank in U.S. by Global Go To Think Tank Index

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Blog Post - Smart Global Health
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

Can an Equity Focus Accelerate Progress in Child and Maternal Mortality in the Next Five Years?

October 19, 2010

J. Stephen Morrison
Director, Global Health Policy Center

One intriguing proposition for doing business differently over the next five years, vis-à-vis achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) by 2015, has come from UNICEF and its new executive director Anthony Lake.

reportBased on a four month study, ‘Narrowing the Gaps to Meet the Goals,’ released in early September, UNICEF proposes that major gains in child (MDG-4) and maternal (MDG-5) health can be achieved through an “equity focus” – concentrating in a new and disciplined way on the lowest quintile (20%) of women and children living principally in low income, high mortality countries. This is a refreshing new idea. 

The report argues that since 1990 disparities in poverty and child development persist or have worsened, despite a significant reduction in under-five mortality in low income countries. These improved averages conceal persistent, nagging gaps that should now be the priority focus of UNICEF and others’ efforts.

UNICEF acknowledges that reaching these populations can be costly and difficult: owing to remoteness, poor transport access, and weak infrastructure. Nonetheless, it argues that an equity focus can accelerate progress in MDG 4 and 5, reduce disparities, be cost effective, and reduce the out-of-pocket expenditure for the poor if a strategy concentrates on three steps: (i) upgrade select facilities for maternal and newborn care, including “waiting homes” for pregnant women; (ii) expand outreach services, eliminate user charges, extend cash transfers to the poorest to cover transport and other costs that impede use of services; and (iii) task shift – place greater reliance upon community-based health workers.  UNICEF's report adds that preventive, promotive and curative principles need to underpin these steps:

“Preventive measures seek to prevent disease and undernutrition and to support pregnant women. Examples include immunization, micronutrient supplementation, antenatal care and prevent of mother-to-child transmission of HIV. Promotion measures foster feeding, hygiene and sanitation practices… early and exclusive breastfeeding, hand washing with soap, correct and comprehensive knowledge of HIV, and the use of insecticide-treated nets to prevent malaria are four such interventions… Curative measures aim to treat disease and conditions, and to support mothers and newborns during delivery and in the postpartum period. They include… antibiotic treatment for pneumonia, skilled attendance at delivery and emergency obstetric care, treatment of severe acute malnutrition, and prophylaxis and pediatric treatment for HIV and AIDS.”

UNICEF’s bold proposition attempts to speak to the moment we are in - of the need to renew the value proposition that equity lies at the core of global health; of making strategic use of responding to the considerable recent accumulated experience of what interventions work best; and of responding to increasing budgetary pressures and the need to demonstrate efficiency and prove concrete impacts through select, core steps, better data and better measurement.

For now, the UNICEF proposition rests on a modeling exercise; full proof that it can be successful lies ahead. It will be important for this approach to be put into practice in countries, with clear strategies, time lines, and budgets: how much will it cost to bring this vision to scale.  And how quickly will we know whether the strategy is succeeding?  It will also be important to clarify better what these changes will mean in terms of UNICEF and others stopping certain other activities. Finally, it will be important to explain how an equity focus can be reconciled with a U.S. approach which, according to President Obama's speech to the MDG Summit at the United Nations in September, will make development and health investments in countries that are governed well: that show economic growth, progress in anti-corruption, greater accountability and commitments and investing in their own budgets personnel and services.  The UNICEF singular focus on equity is thus far quiet on how important governance will be in making future investments. 

 

**Anthony Lake was at CSIS on Wednesday October 20 and presented this proposition to a gathering of experts. Please watch the event below**

 

Related Content

  • Healthy Dialogues, October 2010: Millennium Development Goals
  • Video: Kenya Documentary: Maternal and Child Health in Kenya's Largest Maternal Hospital
  • South Africa and Maternal Child Health
  • Focus on Women and Girls Key to MDG Success
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

More from this blog

Blog Post
U.S.-Japan Dialogue: Strengthening the Partnership on Global Health
By J. Stephen Morrison
In Smart Global Health
July 25, 2017
Blog Post
Yellow Fever in Brazil: The Latest Global Health Security Threat
In Smart Global Health
June 23, 2017
Blog Post
Brazil's Sistema Único da Saúde (SUS): Caught in the Cross Fire
By Katherine E. Bliss
In Smart Global Health
June 21, 2017
Blog Post
GPEI’s Funding Decline Among Tedros’ Top Challenges as WHO Director-General
By Nellie Bristol
In Smart Global Health
June 9, 2017
Blog Post
Achieving TB Milestones Through Last Mile Delivery in India
In Smart Global Health
May 25, 2017
Blog Post
Training the Informal Health Workforce in India
In Smart Global Health
May 22, 2017
Blog Post
What’s to Be Done to End the Opioid Epidemic?
In Smart Global Health
May 19, 2017
Blog Post
New Partnerships Needed after Ebola's Hard Lessons
By J. Stephen Morrison
In Smart Global Health
April 25, 2017

Related Content

Report
Enhancing U.S. Leadership in a New Era of Global Immunization
By Nellie Bristol, Michaela Simoneau, Katherine E. Bliss
September 27, 2019
Report
Ensuring Healthy Populations through a New Era of Global Immunization
By Nellie Bristol
December 20, 2019
Report
Sustaining U.S. Support for Gavi: A Critical Global Health Security and Development Partner
By Katherine E. Bliss
February 24, 2020
Newsletter
GHPC Newsletter: January 2019
By J. Stephen Morrison
January 11, 2019
Commentary
Renewing Global Commitments to Pediatric HIV within the Covid-19 Response
By Katherine E. Bliss
December 1, 2020
Report
Unraveling the Water Crisis in Venezuela
By Moises Rendon, Mark L. Schneider, Arianna Kohan
December 10, 2019
Critical Questions
Universal Health Coverage and Primary Health Care within the Covid-19 Context
By Katherine E. Bliss
December 11, 2020
Report
Brief: Risk & Resilience in Nigeria
By Julie Howard, Emmy Simmons, Kimberly Flowers
February 13, 2019
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2020. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions