Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

   Ranked #1 Think Tank in U.S. by Global Go To Think Tank Index

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Photo: TOBIAS SCHWARZ/AFP/Getty Images
Blog Post - Brexit Bits, Bobs, and Blogs
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

Running Out the Brexit Negotiations Clock

September 20, 2019

It has been just over 30 days since Angela Merkel encouraged British Prime Minister Boris Johnson to put on paper his suggestions for a better withdrawal agreement for Brexit as an alternative to a ‘No Deal’ crash out of the European Union on October 31. Johnson accepted the challenge and promised to come up with something within the agreed thirty-day timeline. Where do the negotiations stand now that this 30-day period has run out?
 
First, some EU leaders have informally extended the “deadline” by two weeks—until the end of September—to give the UK government some leeway and soften the timeline ahead of the EU summit on October 17. However, EU Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier has reaffirmed that the EU sees no legitimate reason to reopen the withdrawal agreement because the UK government had offered no written proposal to avoid the backstop. The European Union has not yet received any formal documentation from the United Kingdom on a workable alternative to this backstop, although UK officials have announced they presented the European Union with technical “non-papers” containing ideas on backstop alternatives.
 
Second, British officials have increasingly spoken of a “landing zone” where agreement between the EU and UK sides can be reached on a new deal. This landing zone now seems to be focused on a Northern Ireland-only backstop that would first focus on agriculture and food products and potentially be expanded to trade in other goods. This option still needs refining, however, as a meeting of EU and UK leaders on September 16 reportedly showed UK prime minister Boris Johnson did not fully understand the complexities of the single market and cross-border trade in Ireland, and the EU team explained to him why custom checks and border posts would remain necessary.
 
The European Union had already proposed a Northern-Ireland only backstop in the early phases of Brexit negotiations but the United Kingdom dismissed it as a risk to the integrity of the Union. The plan would allow frictionless trade across the Irish border and prevent the return of border infrastructure (thus preserving stability and the Good Friday Agreement) by keeping Northern Ireland aligned with EU regulations even if the rest of the United Kingdom diverged from those. However, it faces some hurdles:

  1. According to Irish prime minister Leo Varadkar, agri-food only covers about 30 percent of trade across the border, so the Northern Ireland-only backstop would need to be expanded to most trade—something Unionists, especially the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP, holding 10 seats in parliament), might find unacceptable.
  2. The UK government’s current plan would give the Northern Ireland assembly a veto (the “Stormont lock”) over future EU regulations to determine which ones it would agree to apply to Northern Ireland. This is unacceptable for the European Union because it challenges the integrity of the European single market and would likely prompt complaints from other devolved parliaments that do not have such a say, particularly in Scotland. This option also requires a functioning executive in Northern Ireland, something that has lacked in Stormont for the past two years.
  3. The Northern Ireland backstop would create a de factor border in the Irish Sea, something Theresa May’s government had rejected—and the reason that an all-UK backstop was included in her draft withdrawal agreement. (A Northern Ireland backstop could put the integrity of the Union at risk if Great Britain diverges from EU standards.) There have already been statements by government officials that the United Kingdom would likely aim to diverge on labor and environmental standards.

In the coming days, the United Kingdom will intensify its interactions with the European Union to see if a Brexit “landing zone” can be identified. Curiously, the UK government does not seem to have heeded the words of Angela Merkel as there has been little emphasis on making any meaningful changes to the political declaration, the document that followed the withdrawal agreement and sets the frame for the future UK-EU relationship. This declaration could be the promising key to unlocking the conundrum of the backstop but it remains untouched. There is not much time left for both sides to negotiate a workable new deal. Attention will now turn to the United Nations, where Johnson and Irish prime minister Leo Varadkar will meet for continued discussions next week.   
 
 

Written By
Donatienne Ruy
Associate Fellow, Europe Program
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Related
Europe, Europe in the World, Europe, Russia, and Eurasia Program, European Security, Politics, and Economics, European Union, Geopolitics and International Security, NATO, The CSIS Travel Guide to Brexit

More from this blog

Blog Post
Did Russia Influence Brexit?
By Rachel Ellehuus, Donatienne Ruy
In Brexit Bits, Bobs, and Blogs
July 21, 2020
Blog Post
Would the United Kingdom or Ireland Embrace a National Unity Government Amid the Covid-19 Crisis?
By Donatienne Ruy, Heather A. Conley
In Brexit Bits, Bobs, and Blogs
April 4, 2020
Blog Post
Wins and Fails in the UK Election
By Donatienne Ruy
In Brexit Bits, Bobs, and Blogs
December 13, 2019
Blog Post
Seven Days to UK Elections: A Choice of None of the Above
By Heather A. Conley, Donatienne Ruy
In Brexit Bits, Bobs, and Blogs
December 5, 2019
Blog Post
The Twists and Turns of the UK General Election
By Heather A. Conley, Donatienne Ruy
In Brexit Bits, Bobs, and Blogs
November 15, 2019
Blog Post
A Very British Election: Why 1923 Might Foretell Boris Johnson’s Fate in December
By Donatienne Ruy
In Brexit Bits, Bobs, and Blogs
November 1, 2019
Blog Post
A December Brexit Election to Remember
By Heather A. Conley
In Brexit Bits, Bobs, and Blogs
October 29, 2019
Blog Post
Brexit: The Race to October 31st
By Heather A. Conley
In Brexit Bits, Bobs, and Blogs
October 22, 2019

Related Content

Critical Questions
What Is the Brexit Backstop and Why Is It Important?
By Heather A. Conley, Donatienne Ruy
August 22, 2019
Blog Post
The UK Negotiating Cards are on the Table: Deal or No Deal?
By Heather A. Conley, Donatienne Ruy
In Brexit Bits, Bobs, and Blogs
October 2, 2019
Blog Post
Boris Johnson’s Brexit Deal
By Heather A. Conley
In Brexit Bits, Bobs, and Blogs
October 18, 2019
Commentary
Brexit Becomes More Baffling by the Day
By Heather A. Conley
February 21, 2019
Commentary
Covid-19 May Encourage a No-Deal Brexit
By Heather A. Conley
May 7, 2020
Blog Post
Wins and Fails in the UK Election
By Donatienne Ruy
In Brexit Bits, Bobs, and Blogs
December 13, 2019
Blog Post
A December Brexit Election to Remember
By Heather A. Conley
In Brexit Bits, Bobs, and Blogs
October 29, 2019
Blog Post
Brexit: The Race to October 31st
By Heather A. Conley
In Brexit Bits, Bobs, and Blogs
October 22, 2019
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2020. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions