Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

   Ranked #1 Think Tank in U.S. by Global Go To Think Tank Index

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Blog Post - Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

Chinese Coal is a Stock, not a Flow Problem

December 5, 2019

A new report by Global Energy Monitor drew headlines last week when it provided estimates that China is set to build as much new coal-fired power capacity in the next few years as the entire stock of European coal. This has raised fears that, after years of progress, China is rekindling its coal industry and turning its back on worldwide efforts to reach the Paris climate targets. While this flow of new coal capacity is concerning, it remains dwarfed by the challenge of cutting back the vast stock of relatively new and efficient coal power that promise to lock in emissions for decades.

While 148GW of new coal is eye-catching, the Global Energy Monitor data may overstate the case somewhat. The EndCoal database they draw from  includes many projects that have not yet begun construction and could well struggle to find financing. For example, S&P Platts estimates that China only has around 40GW of coal under construction and forecasts that China’s coal consumption will peak by 2024. IEA data shows that final investment decisions for new coal plants fell from 60GW in 2015 to less than 6GW in 2018.

Regardless of how much new coal capacity China ultimately constructs, its existing stock of coal capacity is the larger problem for global climate targets. Roughly half of the world’s coal capacity is in China, where the average age of a coal plant is just 11.1 years and can be expected to remain operational for another 30 years.  The chart below speaks to this larger concern by showing how existing Chinese fossil-fuel infrastructure (admittedly, not just coal related infrastructure) will emit enough CO2 to use up almost half the carbon budget available to remain under 1.5°C of warming, according to a study in Nature from earlier this year[1]. Almost one third of Chinese fossil fuel emissions come from coal-fired power plants alone and 80 percent of their cumulative emissions will take place after 2013. Similarly, a 2018 report from the Rocky Mountain Institute noted that 844 GW of Chinese coal capacity would have to be retired before their expected lifetimes by 2040 to reach the 2°C target.

The problem therefore is not simply one of halting the flow of new power but how to retire the existing stock prematurely, dramatically reduce their load factors, or retrofit them with carbon capture and sequestration. Some of this was already happening, but as the Chinese economy slows, it is returning to coal as the faithful engine of growth. As global leaders meet in Madrid this week for the latest round of UN climate talks, China could go a long way towards assuaging fears by committing to some of these measures and reaffirming its planned reductions in new coal capacity.

 
[1] NB: this study uses historical utilization rates, which assumes power plants will run for around 40 years, and therefore does not account for the advanced closures or lower load factors (share of hours the plant is running) that could be brought about by a changing policy or economic environment.
Written By
Lachlan Carey
Associate Fellow, Energy Security and Climate Change Program
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Related
China, Climate Change, Energy Security and Climate Change Program

More from this blog

Blog Post
Are Gas Pipelines Really Impossible to Build?
By Nikos Tsafos
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
July 8, 2020
Blog Post
United States No Longer Reducing Energy-Related Carbon Emissions
By Nikos Tsafos
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
April 3, 2020
Blog Post
Which U.S. States Are Most Exposed to Low Oil Prices?
By Nikos Tsafos
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
March 12, 2020
Blog Post
Who is Prepared for an Oil Price War?
By Nikos Tsafos
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
March 9, 2020
Blog Post
The UAE Nuclear Project Is Nearing Operation, but Will It Usher in a Nuclear Power Boom in the Middle East?
By Jane Nakano
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
February 25, 2020
Blog Post
Emission Peak Could Be as Fickle as the Weather
By Sarah Ladislaw
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
February 14, 2020
Blog Post
The Complex Relationship Between Coal and Gas in Europe
By Nikos Tsafos
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
February 13, 2020
Blog Post
LNG Needs Depth, Not Just Breadth
By Nikos Tsafos
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
January 27, 2020

Related Content

Congressional Testimony
A ‘China Model?’ Beijing’s Promotion of Alternative Global Norms and Standards
Statement by Jonathan E. Hillman
March 13, 2020
Newsletter
Greening or Greenwashing the Belt and Road Initiative?
By Jane Nakano
May 1, 2019
Commentary
Gas Line, Q1 2020
By Nikos Tsafos
April 1, 2020
Commentary
What Was Under the Climate Summit Christmas Tree?
By Sarah Ladislaw
January 3, 2019
Commentary
Covid-19 Could Put China’s Clean Energy Agenda on Hold
By Jane Nakano, Lachlan Carey
April 30, 2020
Report
Chinese Multilateralism and the Promise of a Green Belt and Road
By Lachlan Carey, Sarah Ladislaw
November 5, 2019
Report
How Will Natural Gas Fare in the Energy Transition?
By Nikos Tsafos
January 14, 2020
Blog Post
Renewable Energy Development Can Strengthen Energy and Water
In New Perspectives on Asia
October 5, 2020
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2020. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions