Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

   Ranked #1 Think Tank in U.S. by Global Go To Think Tank Index

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Photo: JOHANNES EISELE/AFP via Getty Images
Blog Post - Trustee China Hand
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

Inventing and Investing in the Future: Insights from the Inaugural U.S.-China Innovation Forum

May 22, 2019

Trustee Chair in Chinese Business and Economics > Trustee China Hand 
 
By Peter Shaw and Daniel Burke
 
On April 10, the Freeman Chair in China Studies at CSIS and the U.S.-China Business Council (USCBC) jointly hosted the first U.S.-China Innovation Forum. The kickoff event drew more than 160 attendees from media, industry, academia, and government. Through the course of five panels, American and Chinese experts from industry, finance, think tanks, and government discussed how to best foster, protect, and advance innovation in an increasingly complex global environment.

The event opened with remarks given by Scott Kennedy, senior advisor of the Freeman Chair in China Studies, Craig Allen, president of USCBC, and Secretary William S. Cohen, current board member of CSIS. Shortly after, the first panel commenced with a discussion on financing innovation. The panelists agreed that despite China’s economic slowdown, the Chinese market still presents advantages for both foreign and domestic investors. Chinese government subsidies and funding are abundant in the technology industry, pulling both capital and talent into the Chinese market. The sheer size and possibilities in this market is another advantage. As Michael Kuan of Kuan Capital stated, “To innovate, modern technology relies on modern market needs, and those needs are in China”. However, Joyce Chang of JP Morgan warned that the Chinese government still wants to maintain control over the innovation process and the market itself. This can be cause for worry, especially in terms of developing reputability and intellectual property protection.
 

Photo Credit: CSIS
The second panel discussed the execution of innovation. IP protection, argued John Neuffer of the Semiconductor Industry Association, is the lifeblood of innovation. The strength of the U.S. system in enforcing IP explains why most semiconductor production R&D still happens in the United States despite China being the fastest growing market for chips. Pin Ni, President of Wanxiang America, admitted that previously, China’s innovation environment was chaotic. However, as China continues to develop, business dynamics crucial for innovation require China to strengthen its innovation protection.
 
Photo Credit: CSIS
The third panel continued to discuss IP and standard-related issues. IBM’s Christopher Padilla acknowledged that IP protection has improved as a direct result of having more IP assets to protect in China, but that there is still a long way to go. Terrence Brady of Underwriter Laboratories Inc. mentioned that China is becoming more involved in writing international standards, but that the domestic standards system still is not fully open and transparent. China invites foreign companies to serve on committees to develop its standards, yet they keep MNCs at arms-length and denied full access to important draft documents.
 
Photo Credit: CSIS
The fourth panel focused on the healthcare sector. Jennifer Osika, Deputy Vice President of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), is optimistic about healthcare innovation in China due to the reforms the government has taken to streamline the regulatory framework. However, she cautioned that some measures were still in the process of implementation. Zhang Ligang of iKang and Shen Huaqiong of iMab Biopharma shared the same optimism from their own business perspective. Zhang emphasized China’s great potential in quickly adopting newly emerging technologies, and Shen emphasized China’s market potential due to it having the world's largest patient base and a changing funding structure. Shen also explained that the shared need between the United States and China in the healthcare industry could bring the two countries to closer collaboration. Microsoft’s Director of Health Strategy, Benjamin Shobert, pointed out that the competition in healthcare is still nascent compared to other sectors such as semiconductors, which means that it is possible the current open atmosphere could become less welcoming as Chinese firms advance.
 
In the final panel, Congressman Rick Larsen discussed innovation in the United States and steps we can take to boost our capabilities in strategic fields. Emphasizing that the United States should not embrace industrial policy, he declared, “We don’t need to out-China China, we need to out-U.S. the U.S.” He further explained that America should emphasize building its innovation ecosystem. The United States should focus less on what China is doing and more on the strengths and weaknesses of innovation here. For example, the United States has workforce development and training issues. Therefore, the United States needs to invest in both infrastructure and retraining policies and mechanisms. The United States faces challenges in the tech field, but only focusing on China will cause us to miss what makes the United States prosperous.
 
Photo Credit: CSIS
Three main conclusions emerged from the forum’s discussions. First, don’t panic. Although there are reasons to be worried about Chinese innovation efforts and its effect on American companies and industries, the United States continues to be a leader in most industries. Even as Chinese innovation capacity strengthens, there are an increasing number of opportunities for Americans in the innovation field. Second, the United States already has a multitude of tools to protect its intellectual property, the health of its markets, and national security. Third, the United States could do much more to strengthen its own innovation ecosystem at the federal and local levels.
 
The Freeman Chair in China Studies and the US-China Business Council look forward to the next U.S.-China Innovation Forum and will pursue other avenues of collaboration.
 
Trustee Chair in Chinese Business and Economics > Trustee China Hand 
 
Peter Shaw was a research intern with the Freeman Chair in China Studies at CSIS. Daniel Burke was a research intern with the Freeman Chair in China Studies at CSIS.

                                                                        
 

Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Related
Asia, Asian Economics, China, Economics, Technology and Innovation, Trade and International Business, Trustee China Hand, U.S.-China Bilateral Relations

More from this blog

Blog Post
The US and China: Not Number One
By Shining Tan, Scott Kennedy
In Trustee China Hand
December 21, 2020
Blog Post
China’s COMAC: An Aerospace Minor Leaguer
By Scott Kennedy
In Trustee China Hand
December 7, 2020
Blog Post
China’s Planners Succeed, but What About China?
By Scott Kennedy
In Trustee China Hand
November 11, 2020
Blog Post
Thunder Out of Congress on China
By Scott Kennedy
In Trustee China Hand
September 11, 2020
Blog Post
The Biggest But Not the Strongest: China’s Place in the Fortune Global 500
By Scott Kennedy
In Trustee China Hand
August 18, 2020
Blog Post
America’s Huawei Challenges
By Scott Kennedy, Shining Tan
In Trustee China Hand
July 31, 2020
Blog Post
American Business Confidence in Hong Kong Sinks
By Shining Tan
In Trustee China Hand
July 22, 2020
Blog Post
Can China’s “Stall Economy” Save Its Stalled Economy?
By Shining Tan
In Trustee China Hand
June 24, 2020

Related Content

Blog Post
PowerPoint Primer: Attribution from Behind the Veil of Ignorance
In Technology Policy Blog
May 18, 2020
Blog Post
Finnish Parliamentary Elections Results
By Donatienne Ruy
In European Election Watch
April 18, 2019
Blog Post
PowerPoint Primer: Bluetooth Contact Tracing
By William Crumpler
In Technology Policy Blog
May 22, 2020
Blog Post
Decoupling Between Washington and Western Industry
By Scott Kennedy, Shining Tan
In Trustee China Hand
June 10, 2020
Blog Post
America’s Huawei Challenges
By Scott Kennedy, Shining Tan
In Trustee China Hand
July 31, 2020
Blog Post
Numbers or Perceptions? A Widening Gap in Evaluating China’s Innovation
In Trustee China Hand
July 25, 2019
Blog Post
American Business Confidence in Hong Kong Sinks
By Shining Tan
In Trustee China Hand
July 22, 2020
Blog Post
Brazil’s Data Protection Law
In Technology Policy Blog
September 23, 2020
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2020. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions