Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

   Ranked #1 Think Tank in U.S. by Global Go To Think Tank Index

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future

Photo: Tr3/Adobe Stock

Blog Post - New Perspectives on Asia
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

Myanmar Elections Will Be Neither Free Nor Fair in Rakhine

November 4, 2020

By Kyra Jasper
 
With four days until Myanmar’s general elections, many international observers and opposition parties doubt that the polls will be conducted freely and fairly. These concerns echo those raised during the previous elections in 2015 regarding violence in border states and structural inequities that have only intensified. The United States and much of the international community deemed the 2015 elections successful because of the peaceful transfer of power from the military-backed government to civilian leadership for the first time in more than 50 years. Although observers voiced concerns regarding voter disenfranchisement, especially of Rohingya, the international community hoped that the National League for Democracy (NLD) and its Nobel laureate leader Aung San Suu Kyi would help resolve ethnic tensions and consolidate democracy. Unfortunately, over the past five years, systemic violence against the Rohingya only worsened, border states remain wracked by violence, and Myanmar did not move closer to international democratic standards.

In 2012, the United States began gradually easing sanctions imposed on Myanmar two decades before. In light of the 2015 election, President Barack Obama lifted more sanctions after calling Myanmar a “good news story” because of the successful transition of power from the military to the NLD, which he called a sign of “Burma’s substantial advances to promote democracy...and greater enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms.”

But even as sanctions were being lifted, the Myanmar government was conducting a campaign of persecution against the Rohingya. In 2014, the government precluded them from self-identifying as Rohingya in the nation’s first census in decades. Nine months before the 2015 elections, President Thein Sein revoked 750,000 temporary identification documents (“white cards”) held mainly by Rohingya, even disenfranchising individuals who had been allowed to vote in 2010 and 2012 elections. The Carter Center noted that district-level sub-commissions disqualified a combined 22 candidates from predominantly-Rohingya parties in the run-up to the elections. Nearly all Muslim candidates in Rakhine State were barred from participating, even those from non-Rohingya ethnic groups.

In the run-up to this year’s elections, disenfranchisement of Rohingya has escalated. Agence France-Presse reported in late September that almost all of the 600,000 Rohingya remaining in Myanmar will be barred from participating in the elections. The Myanmar government frequently invokes the 1982 Citizenship Law to block some minorities, especially the Rohingya, from participating in the political process. At least half of the dozen or so Rohingya candidates who applied to run in the upcoming elections have been rejected because officials claimed they could not prove their parents’ citizenship at the time of their birth.

The coronavirus pandemic has exacerbated concerns about election fairness. Weeks after the first cases of local transmission were detected in Rakhine state, the Union Election Commission (UEC) issued restrictions on campaigning on September 8. These restrictions prevent political parties from campaigning in areas with stay-at-home orders, including in Rakhine. Digital campaigning is not viable as the government has shut down the internet in several townships in Rakhine and Chin states for over a year. On October 16, the UEC excluded 56 townships from holding elections at all. Most are in Rakhine, Kachin, Mon, Shan, and Karen states, which the government insists are “unable to conduct free and fair elections.” This means nearly 1.5 million of Myanmar’s 38 million eligible voters will not be able to cast a ballot, including more than 1.2 million of Rakhine state’s 1.6 million eligible voters.

As a result, most eligible voters in Rakhine state—both Buddhist and Muslim—will not be able to participate in the upcoming elections at all. Hundreds of thousands of Rohingya were already disenfranchised ahead of the 2015 elections. And most of those who managed to hang on to their citizenship have were disenfranchised by the military’s campaign of ethnic cleansing from late 2016. About 700,000 Rohingya have fled to Bangladesh since while more than 130,000 remain internally displaced.

Prospects for peaceful relations between the Rohingya and the Myanmar government after the elections are bleak. The military is responsible for the campaign to drive the Rohingya out, but Aung San Suu Kyi and the NLD have no political incentive to intervene. A UN fact finding mission to Myanmar in September 2019 recommended sanctions against senior military officials and companies with ties to the army, but very few countries have done so. The United States has imposed some targeted sanctions against Myanmar military officers, though it also continues to fete the civilian government. On October 28, a U.S. government delegation met with Aung San Suu Kyi and several other senior ministers to reaffirm the United States’ commitment to invest in Myanmar’s economic development and democratization. Since 2017, the United States has invested nearly $330 million in six enterprises in Myanmar. This move comes on the heels of a senior U.S. diplomat urging Aung San Suu Kyi to “secure the voluntary, safe, dignified, and sustainable return of Rohingya and other refugees and internally displaced persons” after a “transparent and inclusive election.” But the elections this month are poised to be even less transparent and inclusive election than those in 2015 – and that should give the United States pause.

Kyra Jasper is a research intern with the Southeast Asia Program at CSIS.

Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Related
Asia, Asia Program, COVID-19, Southeast Asia, Southeast Asia Program

More from this blog

Blog Post
Buyer Beware: China’s Uneven Financial Market Reform Presents Risks for Foreign Investors
In New Perspectives on Asia
December 18, 2020
Blog Post
Newsrooms in Crisis: Covid-19 and Journalism in Indonesia
By Andreyka Natalegawa
In New Perspectives on Asia
December 14, 2020
Blog Post
Who Is Funding Chinese Property Developers, and Why Does China Care?
In New Perspectives on Asia
December 11, 2020
Blog Post
With U.S. Restrictions on Huawei and ZTE, Where Will Rural America Turn?
In New Perspectives on Asia
December 10, 2020
Blog Post
Cambodia and the Misuse of the Global Magnitsky Act
In New Perspectives on Asia
November 30, 2020
Blog Post
Building Indian States’ Capacity in Monitoring FDI
In New Perspectives on Asia
November 5, 2020
Blog Post
The Impact of Covid-19 on Education Inequality in Japan
In New Perspectives on Asia
October 28, 2020
Blog Post
Ease of Learning About Doing Business in Indian States
In New Perspectives on Asia
October 23, 2020

Related Content

Blog Post
The Latest on Covid-19 in Southeast Asia: August 13, 2020
In The Latest on Covid-19 in Southeast Asia
August 13, 2020
Commentary
Southeast Asia in 2019: Four Issues to Watch
By Amy Searight
January 15, 2019
Commentary
Southeast Asia in 2020: Issues to Watch, Part 1
By Amy Searight
January 14, 2020
Blog Post
Challenges to the Rohingya Population in Malaysia
In New Perspectives on Asia
July 10, 2020
Blog Post
The Latest on Covid-19 in Southeast Asia, September 10, 2020
In The Latest on Covid-19 in Southeast Asia
September 10, 2020
Newsletter
The Evening: USMCA Deal, Pompeo Lavrov Clash, JJ Cale and More
December 10, 2019
Blog Post
The Latest on Covid-19 in Southeast Asia, November 19
In The Latest on Covid-19 in Southeast Asia
November 19, 2020
Blog Post
The Latest on Covid-19 in Southeast Asia, September 24, 2020
In The Latest on Covid-19 in Southeast Asia
September 24, 2020
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2020. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions