Great Powers and Geostrategy

Analyzing Great Power engagement with the Middle East and the region’s geostrategic questions

Most analysts note the growing Russian and Chinese presence in the Middle East and presume that the Great Powers will increasingly compete for influence there, given the region’s energy reserves and security vulnerabilities. Yet, even now, the Great Powers see the Middle East differently from each other. Changes in the global energy mix, demographics, trade patterns, and other factors are likely to heighten those differences in the coming decades. The Middle East Program examines evolving trends in Great Power-Middle East engagement, as well as Great Power conflict and collaboration within the region, with a focus on geostrategy.

 

Featured Projects


Image
Photo: WANG ZHAO/AFP/Getty Images

Photo: WANG ZHAO/AFP/Getty Images

The China Model's Middle East Appeal

Analyzing Middle Eastern states’ perceptions and emulation of a China model and China’s changing presentation of its model to appeal to target countries.

Project

Featured Analysis


Image
Photo: YAHYA HASSOUNA/AFP/Getty Images

Photo: YAHYA HASSOUNA/AFP/Getty Images

Israel Could Lose

In a new commentary, Jon Alterman explains that while Israel has the most formidable fighting force in the region, it needs to prioritize winning back global support, invigorating the Palestinian Authority, and splitting Hamas off from the population.

Commentary by Jon B. Alterman — November 7, 2023

Federated Defense in the Middle East

This study examines the potential for a “federated defense” approach to U.S. action in the Middle East, the constraints to closer military cooperation in the region, and specific capability areas that would benefit from federated defense.

Report by Jon B. Alterman, Tom Karako, Richard Say, Colin McElhinny, Melissa Dalton, and Kathleen H. Hicks — September 17, 2015

Featured Testimony


Image
Photo: Cameron Glass/CSIS

Photo: Cameron Glass/CSIS

China and the Middle East

China sees the Middle East as the point of the spear of creating a different world which is more mercantilist and less committed to international law and multilateralism.

Congressional Testimony by Jon B. Alterman — April 19, 2024