Great Powers and Geostrategy
Analyzing Great Power engagement with the Middle East and the region’s geostrategic questions
Most analysts note the growing Russian and Chinese presence in the Middle East and presume that the Great Powers will increasingly compete for influence there, given the region’s energy reserves and security vulnerabilities. Yet, even now, the Great Powers see the Middle East differently from each other. Changes in the global energy mix, demographics, trade patterns, and other factors are likely to heighten those differences in the coming decades. The Middle East Program examines evolving trends in Great Power-Middle East engagement, as well as Great Power conflict and collaboration within the region, with a focus on geostrategy.
Featured Analysis

Photo: Hasan Belal/Anadolu/Getty Images
Natasha Hall in The New York Times: There's Still a Chance to Get Syria Right
Commentary by Natasha Hall — April 2, 2025

Photo: Mohammed Hamoud/Getty Images
Trump Takes on the Houthis
Critical Questions by Jon B. Alterman — March 27, 2025
All Great Powers and Geostrategy Content
Filter by
Hedging, Hunger, and Hostilities: The Middle East after Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine
Critical Questions by Jon B. Alterman and Will Todman — February 25, 2022
When Our Middle East Friends Talk, They Talk about Hedging
Commentary by Jon B. Alterman — February 22, 2022
Rescuing Aid in Syria
Report by Natasha Hall — February 14, 2022
Doing Less Is Not Enough
Commentary by Jon B. Alterman — December 13, 2021
The Puzzle of U.S.-Saudi Ties
Commentary by Jon B. Alterman — October 20, 2021
China Headaches for Iran Deal
Commentary by Jon B. Alterman — September 22, 2021
The Implications of the UN Cross-Border Vote in Syria
Brief by Natasha Hall — June 4, 2021
The Smart Way out of the Middle East
Commentary by Jon B. Alterman — February 22, 2021
Iran Will Still Be a Slog
Commentary by Jon B. Alterman — January 25, 2021
Enemies—and Partners—Will Get a Vote in the Middle East
Commentary by Jon B. Alterman — December 17, 2020