Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intellectual Property
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Building Sustainable and Inclusive Democracy
    • Business and Human Rights
    • Responding to Egregious Human Rights Abuses
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Human Mobility
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Blog Post - Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

How Nord Stream 1 Rewired German Gas

July 30, 2019

By Nikos Tsafos

Debates about Nord Stream 2 make several assumptions about how the pipeline might affect European gas security. Often missing from that discussion is how Nord Stream 1 changed gas flows—after all, the case against Nord Stream 2 mirrors arguments made a decade ago against Nord Stream. It is thus helpful to examine how Nord Stream affected German and European gas flows.

The data from the International Energy Agency show that net imports into Germany did not change from 2010 to 2018 (Nord Stream came online in late 2011), so Nord Stream altered flows, not volumes. Nord Stream supplied 57 billion cubic meters (bcm) to Germany in 2018. Over half of those volumes affected Germany’s trade relationship with the Czech Republic (a 30.7 bcm net change). Germany used to import Russian gas from the Czech Republic via Ukraine, and now it exports gas to the Czech Republic instead. Until 2014, the gas reached Slovakia and Ukraine, allowing that country to import Russian gas without dealing with Gazprom directly. Now that flow has shrunk, and gas only reaches the Czech Republic. This change in Central Europe is the most important shift caused by Nord Stream.

The other major change was the drop in Dutch gas production and its impact on Germany. Imports from the Netherlands fell sharply from 2010 to 2018 (-18.5 bcm), as did imports from Norway (-7.6 bcm)—allowing Norway to sell more gas to the Netherlands (and muting any rise in imports of liquefied natural gas). These three bilateral flows almost perfectly match the gas that came from Nord Stream. Even so, there were other changes too: Germany imported more Russian gas via Poland (+5.4 bcm), it reduced exports to Austria, and it sold more to Belgium, France, and Switzerland. These volumes, too, almost fully match each other.

In other words, it is hard to look at the data and conclude that Nord Stream 1 adversely impacted European gas security: it reduced transit through Ukraine for a few years, and it eventually allowed Russian exports to rise; but fundamentally, it mostly changed how the Czech Republic receives its Russian gas; it helped Ukraine import non-Gazprom gas; it offset the precipitous fall in Dutch gas production; and insofar as it turned Germany into a hub, it did so alongside the Yamal-Europe pipeline that crosses Poland. Nord Stream 2 will, of course, create its own market and geopolitical dynamics; but a reality check on Nord Stream 1, especially against some dire predictions made a decade ago, might lead to a more rational conversation about Nord Stream 2 today.

Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Paige Montfort
Media Relations Coordinator, External Relations
Tel: 202.775.3173
Related
Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks, Energy Security and Climate Change Program, Energy and Geopolitics, Energy and Sustainability

More from this blog

Blog Post
Are Gas Pipelines Really Impossible to Build?
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
July 8, 2020
Blog Post
United States No Longer Reducing Energy-Related Carbon Emissions
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
April 3, 2020
Blog Post
Which U.S. States Are Most Exposed to Low Oil Prices?
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
March 12, 2020
Blog Post
Who is Prepared for an Oil Price War?
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
March 9, 2020
Blog Post
The UAE Nuclear Project Is Nearing Operation, but Will It Usher in a Nuclear Power Boom in the Middle East?
By Jane Nakano
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
February 25, 2020
Blog Post
Emission Peak Could Be as Fickle as the Weather
By Sarah Ladislaw
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
February 14, 2020
Blog Post
The Complex Relationship Between Coal and Gas in Europe
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
February 13, 2020
Blog Post
LNG Needs Depth, Not Just Breadth
In Energy Headlines Versus Trendlines
January 27, 2020

Related Content

Commentary
Can European Energy Cope with a Conflict in Ukraine?
January 21, 2022
Commentary
Finding a Compromise on Nord Stream 2
January 27, 2021
Commentary
Beyond Nord Stream 2
August 4, 2021
Commentary
The Energy Weapon—Revisited
March 18, 2022
Transcript
Press Briefing: The Russian Threat to Ukraine
February 1, 2022
Commentary
A Europe-Russia Energy Divorce Begins
March 1, 2022
Critical Questions
European Union Prepares to Ban Russian Oil
By Ben Cahill
May 10, 2022
Commentary
What Does the Future Hold for U.S.-Ukraine Relations?
By Andrew Lohsen
September 15, 2021
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Paige Montfort
Media Relations Coordinator, External Relations
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2022. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions