Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intellectual Property
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Building Sustainable and Inclusive Democracy
    • Business and Human Rights
    • Responding to Egregious Human Rights Abuses
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Human Mobility
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Photo: Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis/Getty Images
Blog Post - Strategic Technologies Blog
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

No One is Immune: The Spread of Q-anon Through Social Media and the Pandemic

December 17, 2020

By Ian Haimowitz

At some point, you were exposed—and probably also fascinated—by a conspiracy theory. Conspiracy theories are not a new phenomenon. From Ancient Aliens, to pondering if there was another shooter on the grassy knoll, our brains intuitively look for patterns to process information, despite that “sometimes a cigar is just a cigar” as Sigmund Freud noted. However, with most of our attention directed online due to the pandemic, and the rising prevalence of the anti-vaccination and anti-mask movements, we must reexamine how outlandish theories are spreading across the social media ecosystem. Q-anon, a far-right conspiracy theory, is an example of how a conspiracy theory can change and spread through the power of the internet.

Q-anon is rooted in the idea that an elite group of child-trafficking pedophiles has been ruling the world, from Hollywood elites to senior Democratic political figures. The conspiracy traces back to October 28, 2017, when a user from the messaging board 4chan—an anonymous online forum considered the “ninth circle of hell” due to its constant appeal for outrage—revealed the first “Q Drop.” Q, the predominant spokesperson of these conspiracies, claims to have a high-level security clearance that has allowed him/her to access this information. Never mind that Q clearances belong to the Department of Energy, equivalent to a Top-Secret clearance that provides access to restricted data on nuclear weapons and facilities, not pedophiles (the exact relations of Q to the Department of Energy is not known at this time). The Q drops, riddled with cryptic language and peppered with slogans and pledges, captures the story of Donald Trump's role in saving the world from pedophiles.

Q successfully brought attention to his fight against the “deep state.” For example, the #ReleaseTheMemo campaign, a push for the release of Rep. David Nunes’s intelligence memorandum detailing missing FBI text messages to “imaginary secret societies plotting internal coups against the president” saw a 233,000% increase in tweets with the related hashtag in less than 48 hours. While some report that this was achieved thanks to the amplification of Russian bots, since 2018 the Q-anon conspiracy has spread, pouring into the physical world. Q-anon conspiracies have been the cause of several violent attacks, including breaking into the residence of the Canadian prime minister, an armed standoff near the Hoover dam, and several kidnapping plots, with two successful kidnappings.

To facilitate its spread, Q-anon weaves a myriad of conspiracies, from anti-vaccine and anti-5G conspiracies to antisemitic and antimigrant tropes. Social media algorithms, designed to maximize user engagement, make this easier. If you are, for example, into yoga, your Facebook ads and recommendations will be tailored around that interest; maybe suggesting some essential oil groups. It is in these groups that conspiracy theorists thrive, with posts about a variety of issues populating the feed. It’s not hard to imagine articles on anxieties related to vaccinations getting some traction, appealing to new members. What was initially a harmless search into non-traditional healing practices, with the help of algorithms and misinformation, has blurred reality, and convinced users that essential oils can replace vaccines. Intentionally or not, social media is creating a pipeline to conspiracy theories.
Yoga-enthusiast turned anti-vaxxer may sound extreme, but this method has been co-opted by Q-anon to conscript new supporters, while also leading to vaccination rates as low as “Chad or South Sudan” in certain communities. According to researchers like Mia Bloom, a professor at Georgia State University and a leading expert in radicalization, there has been a 174% increase in Q-anon posts throughout the Covid-19 pandemic. Such messaging is attempting to do the same as the yoga example, exploiting anxieties attributed to governmental overreach (mask mandates), economic disruption (lockdowns), and other areas (anti-vax and government microchips).

Facebook has de-platformed groups associated with Q-anon, gradually banning all pages, groups, and Instagram accounts. However, efforts have been slow, with only 790 groups removed earlier in 2020, showing the new difficulties in limiting this group. Twitter is said to have changed its algorithm to stop recommending Q-anon related accounts and trends, however there are still over 93,000 active accounts referencing Q-anon. Other technology platforms are attempting to circumnavigate how to limit Q-anon without completely banning it.

However, when one post is taken down, there still may be ten unnoticed, as individuals within Q are told to “deploy camouflage” to avoid any “censorship.” So instead of using #Qanon on their social media posts, they now use #SavetheChildren. Such efforts are what researcher Marc-André Argentino calls “pastel Q,” an attempt to make Q theories more palatable to the general population, to begin their algorithmic descent into conspiracy theories.

 While once a fringe movement, Q-anon’s growth is exponential, with 22,232,285 tweets with #Qanon or related hashtags in 2019. Comparatively, other popular hashtags in 2019 have less than half the tweets, with #MeToo at 5,231,928 tweets and #climatechange at 7,510,311. Likewise, Q has spread throughout the world. The United States, U.K., Canada, Australia, and Germany account for the top five countries producing Q-anon tweets, and of 150 Telegram groups (one of the leading methods of Q communications), 84 were in German. The international spread of Q is using the interconnectivity of the internet to grow new appendages. However, while the main focus on Q is to stop the cabal of elites battling Trump, the conspiracy theory has been localized to different countries, adding unique twists. In Japan, the conspiracies have included local issues, whether complaints that the Prime Minister’s media ratings are inflated, to even suggesting that a Japanese movie, “Demon Slayer: Kimetsu no Yaiba,” is warning the Japanese people of the pedophilia and cannibalism of the international elite. According to Graphika, a social media analytics firm, Q has diverged, with Brazil and Japan leading the localized efforts, and Western Europe mirroring the U.S. version, while still including their own respective governments.

Fighting Q-anon's capture of minds requires a new approach
One alternative is to implement "off-ramping" measures, originally a method to disengage and deradicalize individuals from violent extremism. Instead of attempting to prevent someone from entering the pipeline of conspiracy theories, the focus is to prevent such efforts from becoming violent. In this case, efforts can come from social media companies by providing access to new networks. Meaning while someone is interested in yoga, and has metaphorically drank the Kool-Aid, companies can recommend knitting instead. While knitting might not be the solution for everybody, it is necessary to remember Albert Camus’s words: In order to understand the world, one has to turn away from it on occasion. Perhaps social media companies could encourage people to take a break from their algorithmic deluge of conspiracies. If not, there are risks of harmless scrolling on the internet turning into violent actions against innocent people.

Ian Haimowitz is a former CHCI Visiting Fellow with the Strategic Technologies Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, DC.

The Technology Policy Blog is produced by the Strategic Technologies Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a private, tax-exempt institution focusing on international public policy issues. Its research is nonpartisan and nonproprietary. CSIS does not take specific policy positions. Accordingly, all views, positions, and conclusions expressed in this publication should be understood to be solely those of the author(s). 

Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Paige Montfort
Media Relations Coordinator, External Relations
Tel: 202.775.3173
Related
Cybersecurity, Cybersecurity and Technology, Strategic Technologies Program, The Political Effect of the Internet

More from this blog

Blog Post
Notes from a CSIS Virtual Event: Artificial Intelligence Applications for Healthcare
In Strategic Technologies Blog
April 11, 2022
Blog Post
ICT Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean Pt. I: Economic Competition Spills into the Region
In Strategic Technologies Blog
April 11, 2022
Blog Post
ICT Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean Pt. II: Supporting Transparent Tech Growth
In Strategic Technologies Blog
April 11, 2022
Blog Post
Notes from a CSIS Virtual Event: Cyber in the Ukraine Invasion
In Strategic Technologies Blog
March 22, 2022
Blog Post
Notes from a CSIS Virtual Event: Cybersecurity Considerations for Data Localization Regulation
In Strategic Technologies Blog
March 21, 2022
Blog Post
Executive Order 14028 and Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR): 10 Months Later
By Georgia Wood
In Strategic Technologies Blog
March 10, 2022
Blog Post
Cybersecurity in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022
By Georgia Wood
In Strategic Technologies Blog
February 16, 2022
Blog Post
Chip Shortages in the Light of Geopolitics and Climate Change
In Strategic Technologies Blog
February 9, 2022

Related Content

Blog Post
Examining Extremism: QAnon
In Examining Extremism
June 10, 2021
Blog Post
Lord Cuomo, We Will Not Be Your Lab Rats: Anti-Vaxxer Appropriation of #BlackLivesMatter and #Reopen Protests
In Strategic Technologies Blog
June 25, 2020
Blog Post
Why Deplatforming Just Isn’t Enough
In Strategic Technologies Blog
February 11, 2021
Report
Is It Possible to Avert Chaos in the Vaccine Scramble?
By J. Stephen Morrison, Katherine E. Bliss
August 6, 2020
Commentary
Co-Chairs’ Statement: Vaccine Confidence, Social Media Misinformation, and National Security within the Covid-19 Crisis
By Katherine E. Bliss, J. Stephen Morrison
July 27, 2020
Blog Post
Examining Extremism: The Militia Movement
By Catrina Doxsee
In Examining Extremism
August 12, 2021
Report
Covid-19 Reshapes the Future
July 28, 2020
Transcript
Online Event: Trusting a COVID-19 Vaccine: The Role of the Media and Misinformation
January 29, 2021
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Paige Montfort
Media Relations Coordinator, External Relations
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2022. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions