Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Report
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

Conflict and Negotiation in Cyberspace

February 8, 2013

ISBN# 978-1-4422-2451-3 (pb)

This report looks at the political-military aspects of cybersecurity and attempts to place it in the larger context of international security. Networks are embedded in our economies and our political and social life. They have become the central tool for human activity. These networks form cyberspace. They hold information of immense value, and they control the machinery that provides critical services. They create immense economic benefit, but they are also a major source of risk to nations. Governments have been hesitant to interfere with the golden economic machine, and the result is a weakly governed space, much like a failed state or contested terrain.

Because of the newness of technology, the lack of explicit agreement among states, and rampant cyber espionage and cybercrime, this unstable environment invites miscalculation, misinterpretation, and inadvertent escalation of conflict. Changing this requires identifying which instruments of statecraft are most effective and where we may need new institutions, norms, and laws. Progress in cybersecurity requires manipulating complex international processes to change what governments consider as acceptable national behavior in cyberspace.

Cybersecurity has been an issue for national security since the 1990s, but the U.S. response has been ad hoc and reactive, marked by uncertainty over how to deal with a major new problem for international security. This report identifies six principles that should guide the United States in developing a strategic approach:

  1. Cyberspace is not a unique environment. States will behave in this environment as they would in any other.
  2. We cannot “disarm” in cyberspace, and there will be no “global zero” for a cyberattack.
  3. We have entered a period of sustained, low-level competition for influence where opponents’ miscalculations and misperceptions are a source of risk to the United States.
  4. U.S. interests are best served by embedding cyberattack and cyber espionage in the existing framework of international law, and long-term U.S. interests are best served by winning international agreement to this.
  5. America’s immediate goal in negotiation should be to increase the risks of launching a cyberattack or engaging in malicious cyber activity for both state and nonstate opponents.
  6. There is a limit to what negotiation can achieve in reducing risk; there will always be risk. The U.S. goal should be to decrease and bound this risk as part of its larger efforts to strengthen international security.
Downloads
Download PDF file of "Conflict and Negotiation in Cyberspace"
Written By
James Andrew Lewis
Senior Vice President and Director, Strategic Technologies Program
Purchase
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Related
Cybersecurity, Cybersecurity and Governance, Cybersecurity and Technology, Defense and Security, Geopolitics and International Security, Military Technology, Strategic Technologies Program, Technology and Warfare

Most Recent From James Andrew Lewis

Upcoming Event
Taking the Quantum Leap
March 3, 2021
In the News
Biden’s Cybersecurity ‘Dream Team’ Has a Nightmare First Assignment
Bloomberg | Alyza Sebenius
February 24, 2021
In the News
Cybersecurity Experts Say U.S. Needs to Strike Back After Solarwinds Hack
CBS News | Will Croxton
February 14, 2021
In the News
Cybersecurity Experts Say U.S. Needs to Strike Back after SolarWinds Hack
CBS | 60 Minutes
February 14, 2021
Commentary
SolarWinds and the Three Rs
By James Andrew Lewis
February 12, 2021
In the News
Huawei suppliers push to reverse Trump's last minute blows
Reuters | Alexandra Alper, Karen Freifeld
February 11, 2021
In the News
Oracle’s Deal to Buy TikTok Reportedly on Hold
National Interest | Stephen Silver
February 10, 2021
Commentary
Ban TikTok (Again)
By James Andrew Lewis
February 9, 2021
View all content by this expert
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2021. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions