Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

   Ranked #1 Think Tank in U.S. by Global Go To Think Tank Index

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Photo: Adobe Stock
Newsletter
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

Will More Australian Gas Stay Down Under?

Energy Fact & Opinion

March 24, 2017

Fact:

  • On March 15, 2017, Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull of Australia met with executives from the largest gas producers in that nation to secure a commitment that sufficient levels of natural gas would be made available for domestic demand.
  • This move came as a response to the statement released by the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO) that a shortfall in gas power electricity generation could occur in the territories of New South Wales, Victoria, and South Australia by next summer if preventative action is not taken.
  • This issue has come to the fore of the Australian government’s political agenda due to a surge in domestic natural gas prices over the course of the past two years as Australian natural gas has been made available to the global market with the development of several large liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminals.
  • Prime Minister Turnbull announced to reporters following the meeting that measures aimed at regulating exports by establishing a domestic reserve could be introduced if producers cannot guarantee adequate levels of supply.
  • The Annual Australian Domestic Gas Outlook for 2017 was held March 14 at which Rod Sims, chairman of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC), presented an update on the ACCC’s inquiry into the east coast gas market. Sims stated that the outlook for gas supply in Australia “is now even worse than it was a year ago” and added “indeed, our worst fears are being realized.” However, the ACCC remains opposed to any gas reservation policy.

Opinion:

Australia is currently the world’s second-largest LNG exporter behind Qatar and is set to become the largest by 2020. Three LNG plants have opened in Australia in the past two years, including the Curtis and Gladstone LNG plants on the east coast, which has brought onshore coal seam gas produced in Queensland to the international market. Consequently, the Australian and in particular the east coast gas markets are now more directly exposed to international oil and LNG prices via LNG export contracts, which has translated into higher and more volatile domestic gas market prices.
 

Source: Adapted from U.S. Energy Information Administration (March, 2017)

The warnings by the AEMO are a manifestation of the underinvestment in the exploration and production (E&P) sector as a result of the oil price collapse of 2014 when producers significantly reduced capital expenditures. While there is still another A$80 billion worth of LNG projects under construction in the country, investment in onshore and offshore oil and gas exploration in Australia has fallen by almost two-thirds in the last two years and now stands at its lowest level since the first quarter of 2006. In addition to this, significant regulatory changes in the oil and gas industry in Australia have also affected levels of investment. Producers have cited a lack of clarity surrounding Australia’s climate policy and regulatory measures on drilling as specific reasons that have had the effect of deterring greater levels of investment in developing new sources of natural gas. In particular, Victoria has now banned all onshore oil and gas production, and there have been significant delays to projects in New South Wales and the Northern Territory due to changes in regulatory measures and state moratoria. To add to producers’ concerns, there are impending tax legislation reforms for the oil and gas industry as well. While current prices and the back end of the forward curve have returned to attractive levels for developing new sources, the remaining untapped gas reserves are either politically challenging to develop for reasons outlined above or pose other technical and commercial challenges.

Upstream investment in Australia surged over the past decade due to the massive growth in demand for natural gas from East Asia. As a result, the likes of INPEX (Japan), Kogas (South Korea), and Sinopec (China) have taken a direct stake in developing several LNG terminals in Australia. Australia’s development of natural gas reserves and transition away from coal to gas would have been a lot slower if it were not for this demand from East Asia. Today, two-thirds of gas produced in Australia is exported overseas, primarily to Japan, China, and Korea, with A$17 billion of export value in 2015 coming from LNG shipments abroad.

It remains unclear how much weight stands behind PM Turnbull’s threat of restricting gas exports from the country to ensure adequate supply domestically; however, this would appear to be a short-sighted solution. If it were to be implemented, it would create a sovereign risk issue, which would negatively impact levels of investment in exploration and production in Australia. In turn this would likely exacerbate the current situation of underinvestment in developing new sources of natural gas and undermine Australia’s growing role as one of the largest LNG exporters in the world and the economic benefits that come with this.
 

Written By
  • Twitter
Jane Nakano
Senior Fellow, Energy Security and Climate Change Program
Andrew J. Stanley
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Related
Commentaries, Critical Questions, and Newsletters, Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks, Energy Security and Climate Change Program, Energy and Sustainability

Most Recent From Jane Nakano

Commentary
Japan Seeks Carbon Neutrality by 2050
By Jane Nakano
November 2, 2020
In the News
Japan Muddles Messaging on Nuclear’s Role in Carbon Target
Bloomberg | Aya Takada
October 30, 2020
In the News
Japan’s New Leader Sets Ambitious Goal of Carbon Neutrality by 2050
New York Times | Ben Dooley, Makiko Inoue and Hikari Hida
October 26, 2020
In the News
Japan to Use Wind, Batteries to Meet Lofty 2050 Carbon Goal
Bloomberg | Aya Takada
October 21, 2020
On Demand Event
Online Event: U.S. EIA's International Energy Outlook 2020
October 14, 2020
Commentary
Hitachi’s Exit Compounds the Geopolitical Complexity of the UK Plan to Revitalize its Nuclear Fleet
By Jane Nakano
October 1, 2020
Commentary
The First-Ever U.S. Approval for Small Modular Reactor Design and Its Implications
By Jane Nakano
September 17, 2020
Commentary
Japan’s Coal Policy Updates—A Glass Half Full or Half Empty?
By Jane Nakano
August 3, 2020
View all content by this expert
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries

Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Caleb Diamond
Media Relations Manager and Editorial Associate
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2021. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions