Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intellectual Property
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Building Sustainable and Inclusive Democracy
    • Business and Human Rights
    • Responding to Egregious Human Rights Abuses
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Human Mobility
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Photo: Adobe Stock
Newsletter
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

International Business Quarterly: Transformers: Why Japanese-nameplate Automakers Became American Manufacturers

October 4, 2017

It’s no surprise to find that competition for investment has intensified. Most nations are eager to attract private capital. Foreign firms build factories, employ local people, fund employee development and product research programs, and much more. Attracting foreign investment leads to a boost in productivity and, over time, helps to raise living standards.

On a cumulative basis, the good news is that the United States remains the world’s leading destination for international investment. iBut it’s important to understand how to enhance the attractiveness of the United States to investors worldwide. There are no guarantees: despite attracting 37 percent of inward foreign investment flows as recently as 2000, in 2010 the U.S. share had fallen to 17 percent. By 2016, the United States had rebounded to capture 24 percent of inward flows, and A.T. Kearney’s “FDI Confidence Index” placed America at the top of its list. ii

What counts in attracting and maintaining international investment? Let’s look at an example that can help reveal the underlying principles. The large, intensely competitive and complex transportation sector accounts for $144 billion in international capital stock invested in the United States. As an example, consider transport sector investment from a single country, Japan, which is cumulatively the third-largest investor in the United States, accounting for 11 percent of foreign direct capital stock.iiiAutomobile firms with headquarters in Japan have operated production facilities in this country for 35 years, which can offer insight into the long-run contributions of these firms.

The automotive sector utilizes advanced manufacturing and research, requiring high-skill employees throughout its operations. This industry is “where the robots are,” according to the Brookings Institution. ivBut the partnership of Japanese capital and technology with American ingenuity and know-how provides consumers with vehicles of superior quality and value while employing thousands of Americans along the entire production network, from research and development (R&D) and design to final assembly.

Honda Motor Company opened the first Japanese “transplant” assembly plant in 1982 in Marysville, Ohio. Nissan, Toyota, and Subaru followed suit, establishing their U.S. plants in 1983, 1986, and 1989, respectively. Today, the Japanese-brand automakers operate 24 manufacturing facilities and 43 R&D/design facilities in 20 states, with the manufacturing plants producing nearly 4 million vehicles a year. v These firms directly employ over 90,000 people, and they indirectly support a total of 1.5 million jobs throughout the supply network. vi And from 2011 to 2015, direct employment at these firms’ U.S. operations has grown by over 20 percent, versus only 5 percent for overall U.S. manufacturing employment over the same period.vii

What is the driving force for this investment? The North American consumer market for vehicles is large and growing, and regional trade rules in the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) have fostered the development of efficient, globally competitive production networks. In principle, successful globally engaged firms tend to have a clear idea of their strengths relative to competition, and they actively develop networks of specialized partners that complement their in-house competencies. In short, it’s a story of comparative advantage and specialization. In a world with falling barriers to the movement of goods, people, ideas, capital, and know-how, this specialization takes place on a global scale, yet the need for local knowledge is still crucial.

What does the United States offer to foreign investors? Here’s how the Organization for International Investment puts it:

“First, and perhaps most important, the United States has one of the most open markets and investment climates in the world. Other benefits include:

  • An unrivaled consumer market;
  • A world-class system of higher education;
  • A skilled and productive workforce;
  • An entrepreneurial culture of innovation and risk-taking;
  • A transparent regulatory environment; and
  • The world’s largest venture capital and private equity market.” viii

International enterprises like the Japanese-nameplate manufacturers are here because of these and other benefits of operating in the United States.

How does “local knowledge” factor in? Automotive design is a good illustration. Even though most cars worldwide are built by a relatively small number of globally engaged companies, driver interests, needs, tastes, and driving conditions vary widely. Design is a specific application of local knowledge. The first to exploit this edge was a Nissan executive, Yukata Katayama, who was sent to Los Angeles in 1960 to establish a foothold in the U.S. market. “Mr. K” led the development of cars tailored to U.S. tastes, including the dazzling Datsun 240Z. ix Today, Southern California is home to more than 15 corporate automotive design studios, including ones from each of the Japanese-nameplate firms. Why Southern California? World-class talent sources like the Art Center College of Design in Pasadena are a part of the story. But California is home to leading firms in entertainment, fashion, computer, and interior design as well. And the natural environment of Southern California is a factor. Tom Matano, the Mazda designer who penned the original Miata sports car, thinks the car could not have been designed in Japan. “Designers there commute by train each day, so how could they come up with the Miata?”x This model of local knowledge continues to the present day: the Calty Design Research Center in Newport Beach developed the 2018 Toyota Camry, which is now being produced in Georgetown, KY.xi

The 35-year history of U.S. investment by Japan’s automakers is, first and foremost, a story of the mutual gains from exchange. So long as the United States stays committed to policies that strengthen its global competitiveness, it will continue to be a desirable destination for this kind of high-quality investment. These U.S. operations have an enviable record of creating well-paying jobs, building a skilled workforce, and giving back to their communities while making products of excellent quality and value for American drivers. And, what’s the latest from Honda in Marysville? The Acura NSX, the company’s most sophisticated road car ever made.xii A tour de force of advanced technology incorporating high performance, safety, and efficiency while providing driving excitement. The car’s lead designer? Michelle Christensen, an American alumna of Pasadena’s Art Center College. The NSX, developed and assembled in Marysville (with engines from nearby Anna, Ohio), is a fitting symbol of what America, and Americans, gain from foreign investment.

International Business Quarterly is produced by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a private, tax-exempt institution focusing on international public policy issues. Its research is nonpartisan and nonproprietary. CSIS does not take specific policy positions. Accordingly, all views, positions, and conclusions expressed in this publication should be understood to be solely those of the author(s).


[i]Organization for International Investment (OFII), “Foreign Direct Investment in the United States 2017,”http://ofii.org/sites/default/files/FDIUS percent202017.pdf.

[ii] A.T. Kearney, “The 2017 A.T. Kearney Foreign Direct Investment Confidence Index,”https://www.atkearney.com/foreign-direct-investment-confidence-index.

[iii] OFII, “Foreign Direct Investment in the United States 2017.”

[iv] Mark Muro, “Where the robots are,” The Avenue (blog), Brookings Institution, August 14, 2017,https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2017/08/14/where-the-robots-are/ .

[v] Thomas J. Prusa, “The Contribution of the Japanese-Brand Automotive Industry to the United States Economy: 2015 Update,” Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association (JAMA), July 12, 2016, http://www.jama.org/the-contribution-of-the-japanese-branded-automotive-industry-to-the-united-states-economy-2015-update/.

[vi] Ibid.

[vii] Manny Manriquez, “For the American auto industry, open trade and globalization mean a more promising future,”Hill,October 3, 2016, http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-budget/298976-for-the-american-auto-industry-open-trade-and.

[viii] OFII, “Foreign Direct Investment in the United States 2017.”

[ix] Margalit Fox, “Yutaka Katayama, Father of the Datsun ‘Z,’ Dies at 105,”New York Times,February 24, 2015,https://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/25/business/yutaka-katayama-father-of-the-datsun-z-dies-at-105.html?mcubz=0.

[x] John Rettie, “The California Influence It’s the home of 15 automotive design studios,”Wards Auto,February 1, 1998,http://wardsauto.com/news-analysis/california-influence-its-home-15-automotive-design-studios.

[xi] “2018 Toyota Camry Design Analysis: Camry Carrozzeria,”Motor Trend,January 11, 2017,http://www.motortrend.com/news/2018-toyota-camry-design-analysis/.

[xii] “Honda NSX (second generation),” Wikipedia, September 20, 2017,https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honda_NSX_(second_generation .

Written By
Scott Miller
Senior Mentor (Non-resident), Executive Education
Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Paige Montfort
Media Relations Coordinator, External Relations
Tel: 202.775.3173
Related
Commentaries, Critical Questions, and Newsletters, Economics, International Business Quarterly Newsletter, Scholl Chair in International Business, Trade and International Business

Most Recent From Scott Miller

In the News
Post-pandemic boom poised to get smacked with severe shortages
Politico | Victoria Guida
April 17, 2021
In the News
Biden Orders Review to Shore Up Supply Chain Resiliency
Voice of America | Patsy Widakuswara
February 24, 2021
On Demand Event
Online Event: Toward a New Global Trade Framework
February 2, 2021
Report
Toward a New Global Trade Framework
By William Alan Reinsch, Matthew P. Goodman, Scott Miller
February 2, 2021
Report
Sharpening America’s Innovative Edge
By Matthew P. Goodman, William Alan Reinsch, Scott Miller
October 16, 2020
Report
Preparing the Workforce for 2030: A Pillar of Trade Leadership
By William Alan Reinsch, Matthew P. Goodman, Scott Miller
October 2, 2020
Report
Key Trends in the Global Economy through 2030
By William Alan Reinsch, Matthew P. Goodman, Scott Miller
September 16, 2020
Commentary
Covid-19 and Value Chains: Diminishing Returns from Trade Policy
By Scott Miller
April 3, 2020
View all content by this expert
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Paige Montfort
Media Relations Coordinator, External Relations
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2022. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions