Skip to main content
  • Sections
  • Search

Center for Strategic & International Studies

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Sign In

Topics

  • Climate Change
  • Cybersecurity and Technology
    • Cybersecurity
    • Data Governance
    • Intellectual Property
    • Intelligence, Surveillance, and Privacy
    • Military Technology
    • Space
    • Technology and Innovation
  • Defense and Security
    • Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    • Defense Budget
    • Defense Industry, Acquisition, and Innovation
    • Defense Strategy and Capabilities
    • Geopolitics and International Security
    • Long-Term Futures
    • Missile Defense
    • Space
    • Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation
  • Economics
    • Asian Economics
    • Global Economic Governance
    • Trade and International Business
  • Energy and Sustainability
    • Energy, Climate Change, and Environmental Impacts
    • Energy and Geopolitics
    • Energy Innovation
    • Energy Markets, Trends, and Outlooks
  • Global Health
    • Family Planning, Maternal and Child Health, and Immunizations
    • Multilateral Institutions
    • Health and Security
    • Infectious Disease
  • Human Rights
    • Building Sustainable and Inclusive Democracy
    • Business and Human Rights
    • Responding to Egregious Human Rights Abuses
    • Civil Society
    • Transitional Justice
    • Human Security
  • International Development
    • Food and Agriculture
    • Governance and Rule of Law
    • Humanitarian Assistance
    • Human Mobility
    • Private Sector Development
    • U.S. Development Policy

Regions

  • Africa
    • North Africa
    • Sub-Saharan Africa
  • Americas
    • Caribbean
    • North America
    • South America
  • Arctic
  • Asia
    • Afghanistan
    • Australia, New Zealand & Pacific
    • China
    • India
    • Japan
    • Korea
    • Pakistan
    • Southeast Asia
  • Europe
    • European Union
    • NATO
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Turkey
  • Middle East
    • The Gulf
    • Egypt and the Levant
    • North Africa
  • Russia and Eurasia
    • The South Caucasus
    • Central Asia
    • Post-Soviet Europe
    • Russia

Sections menu

  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
    • Blogs
    • Books
    • Commentary
    • Congressional Testimony
    • Critical Questions
    • Interactive Reports
    • Journals
    • Newsletter
    • Reports
    • Transcript
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • Web Projects

Main menu

  • About Us
  • Support CSIS
    • Securing Our Future
Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images
Commentary
Share
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
  • Printfriendly.com

The Trump Administration’s Ignominious Exit at the 2020 World Health Assembly

May 20, 2020

On the occasion of the 73rd World Health Assembly (WHA), the Trump administration consciously chose to escalate its confrontation with both the World Health Organization (WHO) and China. The alternative was a path of constructive collaboration in the face of the coronavirus pandemic, the Assembly’s singular focus and the hope of the overwhelming majority of the 194 countries in virtual attendance. Ultimately, any thoughts within the Trump administration about the pursuit of a common purpose—as suggested in a draft presidential letter leaked to Fox News on Friday, March 15—lost out to far more powerful considerations driving White House calculations.

A rapidly unraveling U.S.-China relationship has seen a sharp descent across all dimensions—technology, security, intellectual property, trade—into unprecedented levels of mutual rancor and recriminations. Responding to the pandemic has been no exception. Moreover, unbridled U.S.-China toxicity is blended with, and given additional energy and focus by, the president’s increasingly anxious search for a path to reelection. That is a highly uncertain enterprise in the face of 36.5 million unemployed, 1.5 million confirmed Covid-19 cases, and over 91,000 dead in the United States. Deflecting blame outward to China, and casting WHO as a captive accomplice, is believed within the White House to fire up the president’s base, please the “China hawks,” and strike a mighty blow against multilateralism.

The administration’s ignominious exit in Geneva from any global leadership role in the pandemic response was a two-step escalation.

Secretary of Health and Human Services Alex Azar delivered videotaped remarks on May 18 alleging that WHO’s “failure” to warn the world about the pandemic “cost many lives.” In becoming a tool of China, Secretary Azar claimed, WHO “failed at its core mission of information sharing and transparency when member states do not act in good faith.” He ended by calling “the status quo . . . intolerable” and called for more transparency and accountability from the WHO.

Following Secretary Azar’s remarks, President Trump tweeted a letter addressed to WHO Director General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. The president’s letter was a hastily composed, lengthy charge sheet marred by factual errors, blatant falsehoods, and dubious interpretations of ambiguous evidence. It concluded with the threat to terminate all assistance and withdraw U.S. membership from WHO if within 30 days there are no “substantive improvements” in unspecified areas.

Most importantly, these moments exposed WHO’s structural weaknesses: its lack of any inspection authority or independent source of intelligence and its secretariat’s abject subordination to powerful member states, China and the United States alike, among others. 

At the heart of the dual assaults on WHO is legitimate frustration and anger that it was excessively deferential and unquestioning toward China at critical moments in early January, when the discovery of the virus first unfolded and when China was inclined to obfuscate and delay, particularly in acknowledging human-to-human transmission. Most importantly, these moments exposed WHO’s structural weaknesses: its lack of any inspection authority or independent source of intelligence and its secretariat’s abject subordination to powerful member states, China and the United States alike, among others. 

Trump and Azar’s actions, and China’s equally virulent retorts, created an air of existential crisis surrounding WHO, caught as it is in the middle, and cast a dark shadow over the WHA. However, in the end, the WHA was damaged but not derailed. Taiwan withdrew its appeal for a vote by member states on its observer status to WHO. That step removed one flashpoint that could have potentially ruined the WHA. Taiwan realized it had fewer than 30 votes out of 194. Besides, the logistical challenges of voting remotely in a virtual session were reportedly insurmountable (an in-person WHA session may be held in the fall of 2020.)

The European Union solidified its leadership role in the global pandemic response at the WHA, building on the successful $8.2 billion pledging summit for Covid-19 vaccine and therapeutics it led in early May, which was attended by 40 countries, foundations, and private industry leaders—but not the United States. The European Union garnered support from over 100 countries for a draft resolution that was ultimately adopted, allowing the WHA to achieve consensus in favor of a future independent review of the international response to the coronavirus pandemic. The detailed communiqué also addressed vital issues of how to guarantee access, transparency, and affordability as safe and effective vaccines become available.

By the conclusion of the WHA, the Trump administration had wantonly withdrawn the United States from any meaningful leadership role in the international response to the coronavirus pandemic. 

China benefited to some degree at the WHA, as it sought to recover from widespread anger across the world at its mishandling of the virus. In his statement, President Xi glided past China’s actions in early 2020, responded in kind to Trump and Azar’s charges, and looked forward with a $2 billion pledge to the global Covid-19 response and a commitment to pursue a “common public good approach to the delivery of an eventual vaccine.”

Dr. Tedros kept cool throughout this dark and disturbing moment. On May 18, he made an appeal for pragmatism, solidarity, and commitment: “the world doesn’t need another plan, another system, another mechanism, another committee or another organization. It needs to strengthen, implement and finance the systems and organizations it has – including WHO.” German chancellor Angela Merkel and French president Emmanuel Macron each voiced strong support for WHO in their remarks.

By the conclusion of the WHA, the Trump administration had wantonly withdrawn the United States from any meaningful leadership role in the international response to the coronavirus pandemic. It was a form of self-immolation, a willful regression that now confines the United States to an isolated corner, the object of pity, sadness, scorn, anger, and contempt.

J. Stephen Morrison is senior vice president and director of the Global Health Policy Center at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) in Washington, D.C.

Commentary is produced by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a private, tax-exempt institution focusing on international public policy issues. Its research is nonpartisan and nonproprietary. CSIS does not take specific policy positions. Accordingly, all views, positions, and conclusions expressed in this publication should be understood to be solely those of the author(s).

© 2020 by the Center for Strategic and International Studies. All rights reserved.

 

Written By
J. Stephen Morrison
Senior Vice President and Director, Global Health Policy Center
Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Paige Montfort
Media Relations Coordinator, External Relations
Tel: 202.775.3173
Related
COVID-19, China, Commentaries, Critical Questions, and Newsletters, Covid-19 Commentary and Analysis, Covid-19 Pandemic, Geopolitics and International Security, Global Health, Global Health Policy Center, Health and Security, Infectious Disease

Most Recent From J. Stephen Morrison

On Demand Event
International Norms under Pressure: State Compliance with International Humanitarian & Human Rights Law
May 20, 2022
In the News
N. Korea won’t accept help to stave off coronavirus crisis, experts fear
The Washington Post | Adam Taylor
May 19, 2022
On Demand Event
Reflections on the Second Global Covid-19 Summit
May 18, 2022
In the News
North Korea faces its first covid outbreak without any vaccines
The Washington Post | Adam Taylor
May 12, 2022
In the News
At Biden’s Summit, Other Nations Pledge Billions to Bolster Pandemic Response
The New York Times | Sheryl Gay Stolberg
May 12, 2022
Report
The Department of Defense Contributions to Pandemic Response
By Thomas Cullison, J. Stephen Morrison
May 6, 2022
In the News
Shanghai lockdown's COVID nightmare | Radio Free Asia (RFA)
Radio Free Asia | Radio Free Asia Staff
May 4, 2022
In the News
Shanghai erects metal barriers in latest 'zero-COVID' move
CBC | CBC News
April 24, 2022
View all content by this expert
Footer menu
  • Topics
  • Regions
  • Programs
  • Experts
  • Events
  • Analysis
  • Web Projects
  • Podcasts
  • iDeas Lab
  • Transcripts
  • About Us
  • Support Us
Contact CSIS
Email CSIS
Tel: 202.887.0200
Fax: 202.775.3199
Visit CSIS Headquarters
1616 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
Media Queries
Contact H. Andrew Schwartz
Chief Communications Officer
Tel: 202.775.3242

Contact Paige Montfort
Media Relations Coordinator, External Relations
Tel: 202.775.3173

Daily Updates

Sign up to receive The Evening, a daily brief on the news, events, and people shaping the world of international affairs.

Subscribe to CSIS Newsletters

Follow CSIS
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Instagram

All content © 2022. All rights reserved.

Legal menu
  • Credits
  • Privacy Policy
  • Reprint Permissions